> Then I misread, please disregard my earlier point.
NP, we should probably need to communicate this a bit more clearly. It
seems like activities in general are rather fuzzy to some people.
Cheerio,
Ivan
--
You know, there are many people in the country today who,
through no fault of their ow
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Ivan Cukic wrote:
>
>> I might have I misread it. I thought this was about scoring
>> applications. Reading it a second time I am not sure anymore. Is
>> this about scoring applications or resources within applications or
>> both?
>
> Mainly about resources in ap
> I might have I misread it. I thought this was about scoring
> applications. Reading it a second time I am not sure anymore. Is
> this about scoring applications or resources within applications or
> both?
Mainly about resources in apps - for example, places ppl visit in dolphin,
web pages in
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Ivan Cukic wrote:
>
>> Should this be explicitly restricted to applications? I could also
>> see it have relevance for other things, such as which websites to
>
> Maybe I misunderstood you, but rekonq is an application, right?
>
> Every app that wants to support t
> Should this be explicitly restricted to applications? I could also
> see it have relevance for other things, such as which websites to
Maybe I misunderstood you, but rekonq is an application, right?
Every app that wants to support this api will be able to use it to track
documents/resources
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> for some time now the idea of scoring resources based on usage
> statistics and other criteria is floating around.
>
> 1. RESOURCE SCORE
>
> In the beginning the idea was simple: calculate one score for each
> resource and reme
