On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:18:12 Weng Xuetian wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 08:54:20 Weng Xuetian wrote:
> >> Since 4.8 Soft Freeze is coming, and I'm interested introduce this in
> >> 4.8. (No matter a separate one or insid
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 08:54:20 Weng Xuetian wrote:
>> Since 4.8 Soft Freeze is coming, and I'm interested introduce this in
>> 4.8. (No matter a separate one or inside with kdeplasma-addons)
>> Can I add this to feature plan?
>
> Ye
On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 08:54:20 Weng Xuetian wrote:
> Since 4.8 Soft Freeze is coming, and I'm interested introduce this in
> 4.8. (No matter a separate one or inside with kdeplasma-addons)
> Can I add this to feature plan?
Yes, please do so. :)
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzio
Since 4.8 Soft Freeze is coming, and I'm interested introduce this in
4.8. (No matter a separate one or inside with kdeplasma-addons)
Can I add this to feature plan?
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Sunday 16 October 2011, Weng Xuetian wrote:
>> Emm, pick up old thread ag
I'm not sure about what need to do if the new kimpanel need a release,
but I think the code is ready (maybe further review is needed).
Or replace the kimpanel inside the kdeplasma-addons? Not sure about this.
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Sunday 16 October 2011, Weng X
On Sunday 16 October 2011, Weng Xuetian wrote:
> Emm, pick up old thread again.
>
> So what about with KDE 4.8?
> To will remove kdeplasma-addons's kimpanel in KDE 4.8? and separate
> release kimpanel from now on?
hmm, but then a kimpanel relese should happen immediately, or there will be a
regr
Emm, pick up old thread again.
So what about with KDE 4.8?
To will remove kdeplasma-addons's kimpanel in KDE 4.8? and separate
release kimpanel from now on?
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 5, 2011 00:31:21 Weng Xuetian wrote:
>> 在 2011年10月4日
在 2011年10月10日 星期一 15:39:31，Marco Martin 写道：
> On Tuesday 04 October 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > i propose that we take the kimpanel repository, call it
> > "plasma-intputmethods" (or something similar) and put ALL of our input
> > method related code there. that would include:
> >
> > * kimpane
On Tuesday 04 October 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>
> i propose that we take the kimpanel repository, call it
> "plasma-intputmethods" (or something similar) and put ALL of our input
> method related code there. that would include:
>
> * kimpanel
> * keyboard container shell
> * on-screen keyboa
On Tuesday, October 04, 2011 17:19:40 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> thoughts?
Good idea, maybe as part of Frameworks 5?
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.
On Wednesday, October 5, 2011 00:31:21 Weng Xuetian wrote:
> å¨ 2011å¹´10æ4æ¥ Tuesday 17:19:40ï¼Aaron J. Seigo åéï¼
> For me that's what I exactly want to do in the futre: try to get them merge
> if necessary. And I'm also a input method developer (named fcitx, which is
> not a part of K
在 2011年10月4日 Tuesday 17:19:40，Aaron J. Seigo 写道：
> On Monday, September 19, 2011 20:39:11 Weng Xuetian wrote:
> > So I rewrite kimpanel (Use the same dbus protocol), and use dataengine
>
> *resurrects and old thread* :)
>
> so this is now in git .. and we need to decide what we are going to do with
On Monday, September 19, 2011 20:39:11 Weng Xuetian wrote:
> So I rewrite kimpanel (Use the same dbus protocol), and use dataengine
*resurrects and old thread* :)
so this is now in git .. and we need to decide what we are going to do with
it. my suggestion is this, and i'd like comments on it as
> Hi,
>
> What did you mean with regard to the kimtoy author? Are you going to unite
> your efforts? Or are both applications going different ways?
>
> Thanks for taking care of Kimpanel.
>
As for kimtoy, kimtoy will still be a standalone program in the
future. What I want to do is a plasmoid inte
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 08:39:11PM +0800, Weng Xuetian wrote:
> Hi Plasma World,
> Kimpanel in plasma-addons is without maintainer for quite a long time,
> since the author has some difficulty get access to internet due to his
> job (He has let his friend leave a comment on blog of the kimtoy
> aut
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday, September 19, 2011 22:46:07 Weng Xuetian wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> > On Monday, September 19, 2011 20:39:11 Weng Xuetian wrote:
>> >> So I rewrite kimpanel (Use the same dbus protocol),
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday, September 19, 2011 22:46:07 Weng Xuetian wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> > On Monday, September 19, 2011 20:39:11 Weng Xuetian wrote:
>> >> So I rewrite kimpanel (Use the same dbus protocol),
On Monday, September 19, 2011 22:46:07 Weng Xuetian wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Monday, September 19, 2011 20:39:11 Weng Xuetian wrote:
> >> So I rewrite kimpanel (Use the same dbus protocol), and use dataengine
> >> for instead of direct dbus access. And
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday, September 19, 2011 20:39:11 Weng Xuetian wrote:
>> So I rewrite kimpanel (Use the same dbus protocol), and use dataengine
>> for instead of direct dbus access. And I would like to maintain it in
>> the future.
>
> i am very happy
On Monday, September 19, 2011 20:39:11 Weng Xuetian wrote:
> So I rewrite kimpanel (Use the same dbus protocol), and use dataengine
> for instead of direct dbus access. And I would like to maintain it in
> the future.
i am very happy to hear this :)
what i would like to suggest is this: request a
20 matches
Mail list logo
