Re: QML support for kdevelop and plasmate

2011-09-20 Thread Giorgos Tsiapaliwkas
On 20 September 2011 19:06, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > I think the 3 days refer to his outstanding review requests, not the > language > plugin. > correct.:) On 20 September 2011 12:29, Milian Wolff wrote: > > Sure. But "has" is too strong a word ;-) "should" is much better here I > think > :P

Re: QML support for kdevelop and plasmate

2011-09-20 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 11:29:48 Milian Wolff wrote: > > As it regards plasmate,i will fix my currect reviews(in the worst case it > > is a 3 days work) and then i will work on that. > > [...] > Since you seem to be in a hurry, if you think three days make a difference > or not, [...] I th

Re: QML support for kdevelop and plasmate

2011-09-20 Thread Milian Wolff
Giorgos Tsiapaliwkas, 19.09.2011: > Hello, > > right now we don't have QML support neither for plasmate of for > kdevelop.This has to change if we want to help ourselves and > future developers.I recall that the first time that i code in Qt that > kdevelop helped me a lot,so the same has to be don

Re: QML support for kdevelop and plasmate

2011-09-19 Thread Giorgos Tsiapaliwkas
On 19 September 2011 06:42, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > it would be helpful (at least for me :) if you could define what you mean > by > "QML support -code completion -a popup that will give info about the current word for example -go here http://lxr.kde.org/source/kde/kde-runtime/plasma/declarativ

Re: QML support for kdevelop and plasmate

2011-09-19 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Monday, September 19, 2011 16:26:40 Giorgos Tsiapaliwkas wrote: > right now we don't have QML support neither for plasmate of for > kdevelop.This has to change if we want to help ourselves and > future developers.I recall that the first time that i code in Qt that > kdevelop helped me a lot,so t