Re: Plasma Addons and KDE Applications 14.12 release

2014-11-02 Thread David Edmundson
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Mario Fux wrote: > Am Samstag, 01. November 2014, 17.34:04 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: > > Morning guys > > > Hi guys, should Plasma Addons be part of the KDE Appliications 14.12 > > release? > > > > I guess not? > > > > Do you want to keep doing bugfix releases of

Re: Plasma Addons and KDE Applications 14.12 release

2014-11-02 Thread Mario Fux
Am Samstag, 01. November 2014, 17.34:04 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: Morning guys > Hi guys, should Plasma Addons be part of the KDE Appliications 14.12 > release? > > I guess not? > > Do you want to keep doing bugfix releases of KDE/4.14 or just declare it > done with 4.14.3 (next week)? Just t

Re: Plasma Addons and KDE Applications 14.12 release

2014-11-01 Thread David Edmundson
It was released with Plasma 5.1, so I think it can stay with the Plasma releases from now on. I don't think there's a need for any further bug fixes in the 4.x series. David ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-26 Thread Luca Beltrame
In data domenica 25 maggio 2014 14:46:46, Sebastian Kügler ha scritto: > - Ask to not report bugs against it I've updated the sticky post in the KDE Community Forums: http://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=287&t=120430 I've also pointed people from the openSUSE community to this thread. Let me k

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-26 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On Monday 26 May 2014 11:00:32 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > that was also not my intention. Still we need to rethink how to handle the > addons. We accepted that the addons became a dumping ground for 3rd party > plasmoids which then went into unmaintained state. That is something we need > to address.

Re: Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-26 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Monday 26 May 2014 10:49:11 David Edmundson wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Aleix Pol wrote: > > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:23 AM, David Edmundson > > > > wrote: > >> Hey, > >> > >> we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're > >> distributed as part of Op

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-26 Thread Aleix Pol
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Marco Martin wrote: > On Monday 26 May 2014, Aleix Pol wrote: > > > Hi, > > Having a separate bugzilla component is obviously good as well as not > > having them released makes total sense. I would add also that some will > be > > deeply missed like pastebin plas

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-26 Thread David Edmundson
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Aleix Pol wrote: > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:23 AM, David Edmundson > wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're >> distributed as part of OpenSuse RPMs. >> >> Can I confirm our position on what we're doing here,

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-26 Thread Marco Martin
On Sunday 25 May 2014, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Saturday, May 24, 2014 15:13:19 Luca Beltrame wrote: > > In data sabato 24 maggio 2014 14:54:02, Sebastian Kügler ha scritto: > > > +1 on all of the above. kdeplasma-addons is outside of our scope. > > > > Should distros tell reporters not to rep

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-26 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 26 May 2014, Aleix Pol wrote: > Hi, > Having a separate bugzilla component is obviously good as well as not > having them released makes total sense. I would add also that some will be > deeply missed like pastebin plasmoid or icon tasks but that's just how > things are. Sadly enough, Qu

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-25 Thread Aleix Pol
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Saturday 24 May 2014 12:31:26 David Edmundson wrote: > > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Marco Martin > wrote: > > > On Saturday 24 May 2014 00:23:45 David Edmundson wrote: > > >> Hey, > > >> > > >> we've started to get bug reports o

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-25 Thread Aleix Pol
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:23 AM, David Edmundson < da...@davidedmundson.co.uk> wrote: > Hey, > > we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're > distributed as part of OpenSuse RPMs. > > Can I confirm our position on what we're doing here, based on our > conversation last

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-25 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Saturday, May 24, 2014 15:13:19 Luca Beltrame wrote: > In data sabato 24 maggio 2014 14:54:02, Sebastian Kügler ha scritto: > > +1 on all of the above. kdeplasma-addons is outside of our scope. > > Should distros tell reporters not to report bugs against kdeplasma-addons > for the moment? For

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-24 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On Saturday 24 May 2014 16:51:49 David Edmundson wrote: > KDE 3.x had a clock with 5 pages of config tabs. It was not a great system. > > I don't think there's much wrong with doing one thing and doing it > well. Swappable small parts iis what plasma does well. Exactly! That's why I suggested (an

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-24 Thread Marco Martin
On Saturday 24 May 2014, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > From my just user perspective since I don't write any plasmoids nor > plasma tech for a long thile, there are a few 'clocks' that should > just disappear. Fuzzy, Binary, Digital and Analog should be merged > together and plasma should have just one

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-24 Thread David Edmundson
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Marco Martin wrote: > On Saturday, May 24, 2014, Martin Graesslin wrote: >> I support David on this one. I think we have better ways to spend our >> development resources than to pick up some dead code and port it to QML. > > I think the best thing is to list the

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-24 Thread David Edmundson
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Marco Martin wrote: >> On Saturday, May 24, 2014, Martin Graesslin wrote: >>> I support David on this one. I think we have better ways to spend our >>> development resources than to pick up some dead code

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-24 Thread Tomaz Canabrava
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Marco Martin wrote: > On Saturday, May 24, 2014, Martin Graesslin wrote: >> I support David on this one. I think we have better ways to spend our >> development resources than to pick up some dead code and port it to QML. > > I think the best thing is to list the

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-24 Thread Marco Martin
On Saturday, May 24, 2014, Martin Graesslin wrote: > I support David on this one. I think we have better ways to spend our > development resources than to pick up some dead code and port it to QML. I think the best thing is to list the plasmoids there and prioritize, from the user perspective, wh

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-24 Thread Luca Beltrame
In data sabato 24 maggio 2014 14:54:02, Sebastian Kügler ha scritto: > +1 on all of the above. kdeplasma-addons is outside of our scope. Should distros tell reporters not to report bugs against kdeplasma-addons for the moment? For openSUSE I can take care of that if it is deisred. -- Luca Belt

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-24 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Saturday, May 24, 2014 08:22:24 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Saturday 24 May 2014 00:23:45 David Edmundson wrote: > > we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're > > distributed as part of OpenSuse RPMs. > > > > Can I confirm our position on what we're doing here, based o

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-24 Thread Martin Graesslin
On Saturday 24 May 2014 12:31:26 David Edmundson wrote: > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Marco Martin wrote: > > On Saturday 24 May 2014 00:23:45 David Edmundson wrote: > >> Hey, > >> > >> we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're > >> distributed as part of OpenSus

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-24 Thread Marco Martin
On Saturday 24 May 2014 12:31:26 David Edmundson wrote: > > btw,porting the complete set is kdeplasma-addons is not optional for > > future > > release, because everything that's missing will be perceived as a > > regression, no matter what we feel about it :p > > I really don't agree here. > Som

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-24 Thread David Edmundson
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Marco Martin wrote: > On Saturday 24 May 2014 00:23:45 David Edmundson wrote: >> Hey, >> >> we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're >> distributed as part of OpenSuse RPMs. >> >> Can I confirm our position on what we're doing here, ba

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-24 Thread Marco Martin
On Saturday 24 May 2014 00:23:45 David Edmundson wrote: > Hey, > > we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're > distributed as part of OpenSuse RPMs. > > Can I confirm our position on what we're doing here, based on our > conversation last sprint. > > 1) They will not

Re: Plasma Addons

2014-05-23 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Saturday 24 May 2014 00:23:45 David Edmundson wrote: > Hey, > > we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're > distributed as part of OpenSuse RPMs. > > Can I confirm our position on what we're doing here, based on our > conversation last sprint. > > 1) They will not

Re: Plasma Addons build breakage - Marble wallpaper

2011-05-18 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday, May 18, 2011 15:50:29 Ben Cooksley wrote: > Hi, > > Mailing both lists as i'm not sure where the maintainer for this > component is. Currently, using both Marble master and Plasma Addons > master, I am unable to build Plasma Addons due to the following > compilation failure: fixed;

Re: Plasma Addons build breakage - Marble wallpaper

2011-05-18 Thread Anne-Marie Mahfouf
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 05:50:29 Ben Cooksley wrote: > Hi, > > Mailing both lists as i'm not sure where the maintainer for this > component is. Currently, using both Marble master and Plasma Addons > master, I am unable to build Plasma Addons due to the following > compilation failure: > > [ 93%