On October 8, 2009, Vedran Furač wrote:
> You already have 4 persons that would like
> such feature and adding a hidden config somewhere in
> ~/.kde/share/config/plasma-* would not "increase the config UI overhead"
> so this is a non-issue. Do you have any other objections?
4 isn't a significant #
Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On October 7, 2009, Thomas Olsen wrote:
>> out. If I could have a ½ second delay I would be happy :-)
>
> i'd be fine with a hardcoded .5s delay. we'd want to test various values, but
> i really want to be able to stay away from a config option here.
Every popular soft
On Thursday 08 October 2009, Markus Mauder wrote:
> On Thursday 08 October 2009 01:31:15 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > (it's really an FAQ, isn't it?)
>
> Yeah, actually, you said a couple of very interesting things in this
> thread.
>
> A couple of month ago a few of us under Chani's supervision colle
On Thursday 08 October 2009 01:31:15 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> (it's really an FAQ, isn't it?)
Yeah, actually, you said a couple of very interesting things in this thread.
A couple of month ago a few of us under Chani's supervision collected a couple
of these WayOfThePlasma [1] statements, but noth
On October 7, 2009, Arnold Krille wrote:
> Why? It would be just one more double spin-box directly beneath the one for
> the delay for hiding.
replace "double spin-box" with some other widget and "one for the delay of
hiding" and repeat a dozen or three times.
features without demonstrable merit
On Wednesday 07 October 2009 17:24:12 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On October 7, 2009, Thomas Olsen wrote:
> > out. If I could have a ½ second delay I would be happy :-)
> i'd be fine with a hardcoded .5s delay. we'd want to test various values,
> but i really want to be able to stay away from a config
On October 7, 2009, Thomas Olsen wrote:
> out. If I could have a ½ second delay I would be happy :-)
i'd be fine with a hardcoded .5s delay. we'd want to test various values, but
i really want to be able to stay away from a config option here.
--
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fing
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 October 2009, Thomas Olsen wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > We just had a talk on kde-linux[*] about auto hiding panels and I asked
> if
> > anyone knew if it was possible to have a delay on showing panels? Is this
> > implemented or planne
On 7/10-2009 10:06 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 October 2009, Thomas Olsen wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > We just had a talk on kde-linux[*] about auto hiding panels and I asked
> > if anyone knew if it was possible to have a delay on showing panels? Is
> > this implemented or planned to be?
> >
> >
On Tuesday 06 October 2009, Thomas Olsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> We just had a talk on kde-linux[*] about auto hiding panels and I asked if
> anyone knew if it was possible to have a delay on showing panels? Is this
> implemented or planned to be?
>
> [*] http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-linux&m=125486478602064
On October 6, 2009, Thomas Olsen wrote:
> We just had a talk on kde-linux[*] about auto hiding panels and I asked if
> anyone knew if it was possible to have a delay on showing panels? Is this
> implemented or planned to be?
it isn't planned, no. it's one of those features that we could add but wh
11 matches
Mail list logo