On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Ryan P. Bitanga wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Ryan P. Bitanga wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>>> > On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Ryan P. Bitanga wrote:
>>> >> On Thu, Ju
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Ryan P. Bitanga wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Ryan P. Bitanga wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> >> > On Wednes
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Ryan P. Bitanga wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Ryan P. Bitanga wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Ryan P. Bitanga wrote:
> >>
> >> so I think
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Ryan P. Bitanga wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Ryan P. Bitanga wrote:
>> so I think the best place to do this would be in
>> the destructor of FindM
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Ryan P. Bitanga wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Ryan P. Bitanga wrote:
> >> Because we can launch a new query while jobs for an existing query are
> >> still executing, any slots that are connected to prepare
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Ryan P. Bitanga wrote:
>> Because we can launch a new query while jobs for an existing query are
>> still executing, any slots that are connected to prepare and teardown
>> have to be threadsafe.
>
> setup and tead
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Ryan P. Bitanga wrote:
> Because we can launch a new query while jobs for an existing query are
> still executing, any slots that are connected to prepare and teardown
> have to be threadsafe.
setup and teadrown should be called and executed from the main thread. queries
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Martin Gräßlin
wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 29 Juli 2009 12:53:56 schrieb Ryan P. Bitanga:
>> Another issue is that teardown is currently only emitted when the
>> dialog is hidden. I think the assumption was that there would be a one
>> to one correspondence between emissi
Am Mittwoch 29 Juli 2009 12:53:56 schrieb Ryan P. Bitanga:
> Hi all,
>
> I should have thought of this sooner, but upon taking a closer look at
> the code, I just realized that we have a few issues with the whole
> setup/teardown scenario.
>
> Because we can launch a new query while jobs for an exi
