On October 9, 2009 07:11:38 pm Thilo-Alexander Ginkel wrote:
> On Thursday 01 October 2009 01:48:29 Shawn Starr wrote:
> > > Now that my Weather Ion is mostly feature-complete, how does the
> > > further process look like? Should I submit a review request? Should it
> > > first go to the playground
On Thursday 01 October 2009 01:48:29 Shawn Starr wrote:
> > Now that my Weather Ion is mostly feature-complete, how does the further
> > process look like? Should I submit a review request? Should it first go
> > to the playground? (Feel free to point me to a Wiki page if there is any
> > explainin
On September 30, 2009 03:14:01 pm Thilo-Alexander Ginkel wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 September 2009 19:20:55 Shawn Starr wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, wetter.com only provides forecast data through its free
> > > web service API, so the Ion actually has no access to current
> > > observation data to pro
On Wednesday 30 September 2009 19:20:55 Shawn Starr wrote:
> > Unfortunately, wetter.com only provides forecast data through its free
> > web service API, so the Ion actually has no access to current observation
> > data to provide to the Weather Plasmoid. AFAICS this results in some ugly
> > rende
On September 29, 2009 09:14:42 pm Thilo-Alexander Ginkel wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am currently developing a Weather Ion for the German wetter.com weather
> data provider to improve the station coverage for Germany, Austria and
> Switzerland.
>
> Unfortunately, wetter.com only provides for
