On Friday, August 19, 2011 02:15:29 David wrote:
> I don't know why do you want to break every single thing. Even the most
> little ones. Is converting user's experience into a nightmareyour passion?
i won't repeat what Martin already said, though what he said is 100% correct.
i just want to add
On Thursday, August 18, 2011 18:51:30 Eric Mesa wrote:
> I use it daily for my Konversation window
can you set a window rule instead and achieve the same thing?
--
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43
KDE core developer spons
A Sexta, 19 de Agosto de 2011 01:15:29 David você escreveu:
> I don't know why do you want to break every single thing. Even the
> most little ones. Is converting user's experience into a nightmare
> your passion?
Nope but we tend to abuse on the amount of things we present to a user at a
glance,
Am Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:19:24 +0200
schrieb Christoph Feck :
> If you remove the menu entries, at least make sure you have global
> shortcuts for changing transparency quickly (+/- by 20%, set to
> opaque), so that I can assign gestures to those operations.
Leaving the generally valid shortcut d
On Friday 19 August 2011 10:08:40 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> a titlebar wheelevent, even if a bit hidden, is way more ergonomic.
Not every input device has a wheel. My stylus has all three mouse
buttons, but no wheel.
If you remove the menu entries, at least make sure you have global
shortcuts f
On Thursday, August 18, 2011 19:20:08 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> just an idea I had today: do we really need the opacity menu in the Alt+F3
> menu?
That menu is really hard to use, because it's too long, yes. Also the submenus
aren't great, because they require quite some patience to navigate, espec
On Donnerstag 18 August 2011 19:20:08 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> just an idea I had today: do we really need the opacity menu in the Alt+F3
> menu?
Don't know if you need it, I use it regularly. Wouldn't mind moving it into the
Advanced
sub-menu, though.
__
- Ursprüngliche Mitteilung -
> I don't know why do you want to break every single thing. Even the most
> little ones.
Would you like to elaborate how this breaks anything? Would you please explain
why you consider the menu (not the functionality) so important? Please note
that I asked f
I don't know why do you want to break every single thing. Even the
most little ones. Is converting user's experience into a nightmare
your passion?
--
Cheers,
David
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo
> >
> > Personally I don't see a good reason for having the opacity menu at all
> > and I found it kind of techy (look what we can do: isn't that awesome?
> > Translucent Windows!). So convince me to not remove it :-)
> >
> > Cheers
> > Martin
I use it daily for my Konversation window
-
A Quinta, 18 de Agosto de 2011 18:20:08 Martin Gräßlin você escreveu:
> Hi all,
>
> just an idea I had today: do we really need the opacity menu in the Alt+F3
> menu?
kill it die die :)
> Reasons against the menu:
> * menu in tasks applet does not provide the opacity (missing consistency)
> * Op
Am Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:20:08 +0200
schrieb Martin Gräßlin :
> Hi all,
>
> just an idea I had today: do we really need the opacity menu in the
> Alt+F3 menu?
I think it's just a leftover from the time when kwin used to control
kcompmgr.
I'd say the entire menu just is a mess.
Most items there ar
Hi all,
just an idea I had today: do we really need the opacity menu in the Alt+F3 menu?
Reasons against the menu:
* menu in tasks applet does not provide the opacity (missing consistency)
* Opacity is not really useful as both foreground and background are modified
(hard to read)
and no blur b
13 matches
Mail list logo
