On 20 September 2011 19:06, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
>
> I think the 3 days refer to his outstanding review requests, not the
> language
> plugin.
>
correct.:)
On 20 September 2011 12:29, Milian Wolff wrote:
>
> Sure. But "has" is too strong a word ;-) "should" is much better here I
> think
> :P
On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 11:29:48 Milian Wolff wrote:
> > As it regards plasmate,i will fix my currect reviews(in the worst case it
> > is a 3 days work) and then i will work on that.
> > [...]
> Since you seem to be in a hurry, if you think three days make a difference
> or not, [...]
I th
Giorgos Tsiapaliwkas, 19.09.2011:
> Hello,
>
> right now we don't have QML support neither for plasmate of for
> kdevelop.This has to change if we want to help ourselves and
> future developers.I recall that the first time that i code in Qt that
> kdevelop helped me a lot,so the same has to be don
On 19 September 2011 06:42, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> it would be helpful (at least for me :) if you could define what you mean
> by
> "QML support
-code completion
-a popup that will give info about the current word
for example
-go here
http://lxr.kde.org/source/kde/kde-runtime/plasma/declarativ
On Monday, September 19, 2011 16:26:40 Giorgos Tsiapaliwkas wrote:
> right now we don't have QML support neither for plasmate of for
> kdevelop.This has to change if we want to help ourselves and
> future developers.I recall that the first time that i code in Qt that
> kdevelop helped me a lot,so t
Hello,
right now we don't have QML support neither for plasmate of for
kdevelop.This has to change if we want to help ourselves and
future developers.I recall that the first time that i code in Qt that
kdevelop helped me a lot,so the same has to be done for QML.
Agree?
Both projects can benefit f
