Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-04-08 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 12:33:10PM +0300, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote: > The plasmate repository has been renamed to plasma-sdk. > The frameworks branch has been merged into master, so master > is Qt5/KF5 based. And the frameworks branch has been removed. > > The latest sha of the old master(KDE4 b

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-04-08 Thread Antonis Tsiapaliokas
The plasmate repository has been renamed to plasma-sdk. The frameworks branch has been merged into master, so master is Qt5/KF5 based. And the frameworks branch has been removed. The latest sha of the old master(KDE4 based) is currenty being hold into the "KDE4" tag. I have send the following pat

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-04-03 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 03 April 2015 20:41:47 David Edmundson wrote: > > > > I don't have a problem with it depending on stuff in extragear as we > > depend on many external items. As long as that stuff we depend on in > > extragear doesn't depend on stuff in plasma. > > What happens when kdevplatform releas

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-04-03 Thread David Edmundson
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 08:52:09PM +0300, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 06:08:52PM +0200, David Edmundson wrote: > > > Can it go under kde/workspace if in future it will depend on something > in > > > extragear? >

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-04-03 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 08:52:09PM +0300, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 06:08:52PM +0200, David Edmundson wrote: > > Can it go under kde/workspace if in future it will depend on something in > > extragear? > > > > I still support doing the rest, and making / release.. I'm ju

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-04-03 Thread Antonis Tsiapaliokas
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 06:08:52PM +0200, David Edmundson wrote: > Can it go under kde/workspace if in future it will depend on something in > extragear? > > I still support doing the rest, and making / release.. I'm just not sure we > can do the move and release it with plasma. At the moment the

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-04-03 Thread David Edmundson
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Antonis Tsiapaliokas < antonis.tsiapalio...@kde.org> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 01:51:02PM +0200, Marco Martin wrote: > > Any news on this? > > besides plasmate, the repository has other utilities (plasmoidviewer, > > plasmaengineexplorer, plasmathemeexplorer,

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-04-03 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 06:53:28PM +0300, Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote: > As it has been mentioned in previous email, we must first mail the > kde-core-devel. > As a new name i suggess the plasma-sdk and it will be under the kde/workspace. Please do so :) I'll include it in the beta tars next week

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-04-03 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 03 April 2015 18:53:28 Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote: > > > 4. make the PLASMATE_BUILD_WITH_KDEVPLATFORM off(false) by default and > > > add a > > > > > > message that will inform the user that the plasmate application > > > > > > isn't ready yet > > > > > > for production. > >

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-04-03 Thread Antonis Tsiapaliokas
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 01:51:02PM +0200, Marco Martin wrote: > Any news on this? > besides plasmate, the repository has other utilities (plasmoidviewer, > plasmaengineexplorer, plasmathemeexplorer, cuttlefish) that really NEED to be > released Yes, I am sorry for the delay. So lets summarize a b

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-04-01 Thread Marco Martin
Any news on this? besides plasmate, the repository has other utilities (plasmoidviewer, plasmaengineexplorer, plasmathemeexplorer, cuttlefish) that really NEED to be released On Thursday 29 January 2015, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote: > Hello, > > I believe that before we release plasmate we shoul

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-02-10 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Tuesday, February 03, 2015 12:29:08 Philipp A. wrote: > Sebastian Kügler schrieb am Tue Feb 03 2015 at 12:59:22: > > If you're using imports, you have to install them first, no way around > > that. > > no way, that’s silly. > > how can we fix that? You may be able to work around that by adju

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-02-03 Thread Giorgos Tsiapaliokas
On 2/3/15 1:59 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: The repo name is I think a bit confusing. I think plasma-sdk would fit it better. +1 On 1/30/15 11:57 AM, Marco Martin wrote: maybe a quiet last kde4 release? so would be called the version, then 4 and 5 released more or less at the same time I gue

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-02-03 Thread Philipp A.
Sebastian Kügler schrieb am Tue Feb 03 2015 at 12:59:22: > If you're using imports, you have to install them first, no way around > that. > no way, that’s silly. how can we fix that? ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-02-03 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Sunday, February 01, 2015 10:12:27 Aleix Pol wrote: > So the plan is to be able to release Plasmate without Plasmate? The repo name is I think a bit confusing. I think plasma-sdk would fit it better. Cheers, -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 _

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-02-03 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Tuesday, February 03, 2015 08:51:53 Philipp A. wrote: > i had problems using plasmoidviewer with a native plugin. > > if someone could get the test script to work here without temporary > installing, i’d be stoked! If you're using imports, you have to install them first, no way around that. C

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-02-03 Thread Philipp A.
i had problems using plasmoidviewer with a native plugin. if someone could get the test script to work here without temporary installing, i’d be stoked! https://github.com/flying-sheep/steam-plasmoid Aleix Pol schrieb am Sun Feb 01 2015 at 10:13:06: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Giorgos T

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-02-01 Thread Aleix Pol
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote: > Hello, > > I believe that before we release plasmate we should > reconsider the release strategy. > > The current situation is that > 1. the plasmate repo is in extragear > 2. plasmate's repo version doesn't match the one of plasma. >

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-01-30 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 29 January 2015 19:41:21 Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote: > > last thing, are there changes in master for kde4 not released? it may > > be good > > at least tagging it if so. > > yes there are. Should I just add a tag named "kde4" or something like that? maybe a quiet last kde4 release?

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-01-29 Thread Giorgos Tsiapaliokas
On 01/29/2015 02:52 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: when plasmate's new version is usable and useful, I'd like to turn this into an optional dependency, so if kdevplatform is there, we'll automatically build the plasmate IDE. +1 On 01/29/2015 02:42 PM, Marco Martin wrote: > yeah, master should be

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-01-29 Thread Sebastian Kügler
These plans sound good to me. Thanks Giorgos for getting the ball rolling. On Thursday, January 29, 2015 14:36:13 Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote: > 4. make the PLASMATE_BUILD_WITH_KDEVPLATFORM off(false) by default and > add a > message that will inform the user that the plasmate application >

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-01-29 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 29 January 2015 13:40:20 David Edmundson wrote: > > plasmoidviewer 2.0 > > > > but plasmoidviewer 5.x > > > > 3. merge the frameworks branch into master and delete the frameworks > > branch > > Can we do this merge before we do the actual moving. Otherwise we have to > update the

Re: Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-01-29 Thread David Edmundson
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas < giorgos.tsiapalio...@kde.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I believe that before we release plasmate we should > reconsider the release strategy. > > The current situation is that > 1. the plasmate repo is in extragear > 2. plasmate's repo version do

Proposal regarding plasmate's release

2015-01-29 Thread Giorgos Tsiapaliokas
Hello, I believe that before we release plasmate we should reconsider the release strategy. The current situation is that 1. the plasmate repo is in extragear 2. plasmate's repo version doesn't match the one of plasma. 3. the master branch contains the KDE4 code and the frameworks branch con