Ok will be done tomorrow as soon as i arrive at the office :D
2009/1/27 Aaron J. Seigo
> On Monday 26 January 2009, Alexis Ménard wrote:
> > Aie aie aie. Valgrind complain and we never know, people can use the
> > pointer to do some stuff when they get the appletRemoved signal, (we
> > already d
On Monday 26 January 2009, Alexis Ménard wrote:
> Aie aie aie. Valgrind complain and we never know, people can use the
> pointer to do some stuff when they get the appletRemoved signal, (we
> already do that in our panel.cpp class).
erf; yes, that pointer is not supposed to be used *sigh*
> > I g
On Monday 26 January 2009 15:21:58 Alexis Ménard wrote:
> PS : Sorry for don't using the review board but it doesn't work with git, i
> don't have the svn revision.
Second thinking, if it's a script, i still have it somewhere, no? ;-)
here it is, copy&paste it into some executable file and then u
On Monday 26 January 2009 15:21:58 Alexis Ménard wrote:
> PS : Sorry for don't using the review board but it doesn't work with git, i
> don't have the svn revision.
it does... i think i mailed a script to the list in answer to sebas i think...
some time ago anyways, look up in the archives! =)
B
Hello folks,
There is a problem with appletRemoved public signal in containment. Here is
the signature :
/**
* This signal is emitted when an applet is destroyed
*/
void appletRemoved(Plasma::Applet *applet);
So a containment that is connected to this signal expect an Applet pointer.
But who
