apol added a comment.
:)
REPOSITORY
R134 Discover Software Store
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D10611
To: ngraham, #discover_software_store, apol
Cc: plasma-devel, ZrenBot, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts,
sebas, apol, mart
ngraham added a comment.
You said ship-it in the Telegram channel! :)
REPOSITORY
R134 Discover Software Store
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D10611
To: ngraham, #discover_software_store, apol
Cc: plasma-devel, ZrenBot, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts,
sebas,
apol added a comment.
? xD what happened here?
+1 anyway
REPOSITORY
R134 Discover Software Store
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D10611
To: ngraham, #discover_software_store, apol
Cc: plasma-devel, ZrenBot, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts,
sebas, apol, m
This revision was not accepted when it landed; it landed in state "Needs
Review".
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit R134:4959871c57d7: Put all systemwide add-ons in Plasma Addons
category (authored by ngraham).
REPOSITORY
R13
ngraham edited the summary of this revision.
REPOSITORY
R134 Discover Software Store
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D10611
To: ngraham, #discover_software_store, apol
Cc: plasma-devel, ZrenBot, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts,
sebas, apol, mart
ngraham edited the test plan for this revision.
REPOSITORY
R134 Discover Software Store
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D10611
To: ngraham, #discover_software_store, apol
Cc: plasma-devel, ZrenBot, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts,
sebas, apol, mart
category now only has actual app-specific addons:
Plasma Addons category is now nice and full:
REPOSITORY
R134 Discover Software Store
BRANCH
more-plasma-addons (branched from Plasma/5.12)
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D10611
AFFECTED FILES
libdiscover/backends
th the QUrls returned by
clipboard.contentFormat(), but it doesn't affect the urllists from
drop/drag.urls, so I thought it's better to just add in the toString() instead
of making a version of objectToArray just for clipboard.contentFormat().
REPOSITORY
R114 Plasma
ty clipboard!
> +return; // do nothing (there's the tooltip!)
This is not correct. What if the content isn't urls?
REPOSITORY
R114 Plasma Addons
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4805
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
T
yuenlim marked an inline comment as done.
REPOSITORY
R114 Plasma Addons
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4805
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: yuenlim, #plasma, apol, mart
Cc: broulik, plasma-devel, progwolff, lesliezhai, ali
1966#toc
REPOSITORY
R114 Plasma Addons
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4805?vs=11840&id=11966
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4805
AFFECTED FILES
applets/quickshare/plasmoid/contents/ui/ShareDialog.qml
applets/quickshare/plasmoid/contents/ui/
he Enter key on numpad)
REPOSITORY
R114 Plasma Addons
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4805
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: yuenlim, #plasma, apol, mart
Cc: broulik, plasma-devel, progwolff, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterb
mart accepted this revision.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
REPOSITORY
R114 Plasma Addons
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4805
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
To: yuenlim, #plasma, apol, mart
Cc: plasma-devel
yuenlim created this revision.
Restricted Application added a project: Plasma.
Restricted Application added a subscriber: plasma-devel.
REVISION SUMMARY
Plasma-addons repository side changes for Differential
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4803
REPOSITORY
R114 Plasma Addons
REVISION DETAIL
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Mario Fux wrote:
> Am Samstag, 01. November 2014, 17.34:04 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
>
> Morning guys
>
> > Hi guys, should Plasma Addons be part of the KDE Appliications 14.12
> > release?
> >
> > I guess not?
> >
>
Am Samstag, 01. November 2014, 17.34:04 schrieb Albert Astals Cid:
Morning guys
> Hi guys, should Plasma Addons be part of the KDE Appliications 14.12
> release?
>
> I guess not?
>
> Do you want to keep doing bugfix releases of KDE/4.14 or just declare it
> done with 4.14
It was released with Plasma 5.1, so I think it can stay with the Plasma
releases from now on.
I don't think there's a need for any further bug fixes in the 4.x series.
David
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman
Hi guys, should Plasma Addons be part of the KDE Appliications 14.12 release?
I guess not?
Do you want to keep doing bugfix releases of KDE/4.14 or just declare it done
with 4.14.3 (next week)?
Cheers,
Albert
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma
Luigi Toscano ha scritto:
> David Edmundson ha scritto:
>> i18n people,
>>
>> KDE Plasma Addons is in a tricky i18n state.
>> We have lots of code that hasn't yet been ported to Plasma 5, so naturally it
>> is disabled.
>>
>> This means we have
David Edmundson ha scritto:
> i18n people,
>
> KDE Plasma Addons is in a tricky i18n state.
> We have lots of code that hasn't yet been ported to Plasma 5, so naturally it
> is disabled.
>
> This means we have a lot of i18n strings that are basically unused in this
i18n people,
KDE Plasma Addons is in a tricky i18n state.
We have lots of code that hasn't yet been ported to Plasma 5, so naturally
it is disabled.
This means we have a lot of i18n strings that are basically unused in this
release. I don't want to delete them because the same st
In data domenica 25 maggio 2014 14:46:46, Sebastian Kügler ha scritto:
> - Ask to not report bugs against it
I've updated the sticky post in the KDE Community Forums:
http://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=287&t=120430
I've also pointed people from the openSUSE community to this thread. Let me
k
On Monday 26 May 2014 11:00:32 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> that was also not my intention. Still we need to rethink how to handle the
> addons. We accepted that the addons became a dumping ground for 3rd party
> plasmoids which then went into unmaintained state. That is something we need
> to address.
On Monday 26 May 2014 10:49:11 David Edmundson wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Aleix Pol wrote:
> > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:23 AM, David Edmundson
> >
> > wrote:
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> we've started to get bug reports on plasma-a
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Monday 26 May 2014, Aleix Pol wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Having a separate bugzilla component is obviously good as well as not
> > having them released makes total sense. I would add also that some will
> be
> > deeply missed like pastebin plas
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:23 AM, David Edmundson
> wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're
>> distributed as part of OpenSuse RPMs.
>>
&g
On Sunday 25 May 2014, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Saturday, May 24, 2014 15:13:19 Luca Beltrame wrote:
> > In data sabato 24 maggio 2014 14:54:02, Sebastian Kügler ha scritto:
> > > +1 on all of the above. kdeplasma-addons is outside of our scope.
> >
> > Should distros tell reporters not to rep
On Monday 26 May 2014, Aleix Pol wrote:
> Hi,
> Having a separate bugzilla component is obviously good as well as not
> having them released makes total sense. I would add also that some will be
> deeply missed like pastebin plasmoid or icon tasks but that's just how
> things are. Sadly enough, Qu
;>
> > >> we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're
> > >> distributed as part of OpenSuse RPMs.
> > >>
> > >> Can I confirm our position on what we're doing here, based on our
> > >> convers
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:23 AM, David Edmundson <
da...@davidedmundson.co.uk> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're
> distributed as part of OpenSuse RPMs.
>
> Can I confirm our position on what we're doing
On Saturday, May 24, 2014 15:13:19 Luca Beltrame wrote:
> In data sabato 24 maggio 2014 14:54:02, Sebastian Kügler ha scritto:
> > +1 on all of the above. kdeplasma-addons is outside of our scope.
>
> Should distros tell reporters not to report bugs against kdeplasma-addons
> for the moment? For
On Saturday 24 May 2014 16:51:49 David Edmundson wrote:
> KDE 3.x had a clock with 5 pages of config tabs. It was not a great system.
>
> I don't think there's much wrong with doing one thing and doing it
> well. Swappable small parts iis what plasma does well.
Exactly! That's why I suggested (an
On Saturday 24 May 2014, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> From my just user perspective since I don't write any plasmoids nor
> plasma tech for a long thile, there are a few 'clocks' that should
> just disappear. Fuzzy, Binary, Digital and Analog should be merged
> together and plasma should have just one
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Saturday, May 24, 2014, Martin Graesslin wrote:
>> I support David on this one. I think we have better ways to spend our
>> development resources than to pick up some dead code and port it to QML.
>
> I think the best thing is to list the
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
>> On Saturday, May 24, 2014, Martin Graesslin wrote:
>>> I support David on this one. I think we have better ways to spend our
>>> development resources than to pick up some dead code
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Saturday, May 24, 2014, Martin Graesslin wrote:
>> I support David on this one. I think we have better ways to spend our
>> development resources than to pick up some dead code and port it to QML.
>
> I think the best thing is to list the
On Saturday, May 24, 2014, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> I support David on this one. I think we have better ways to spend our
> development resources than to pick up some dead code and port it to QML.
I think the best thing is to list the plasmoids there and prioritize, from
the user perspective, wh
In data sabato 24 maggio 2014 14:54:02, Sebastian Kügler ha scritto:
> +1 on all of the above. kdeplasma-addons is outside of our scope.
Should distros tell reporters not to report bugs against kdeplasma-addons for
the moment? For openSUSE I can take care of that if it is deisred.
--
Luca Belt
On Saturday, May 24, 2014 08:22:24 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Saturday 24 May 2014 00:23:45 David Edmundson wrote:
> > we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're
> > distributed as part of OpenSuse RPMs.
> >
> > Can I confirm our pos
On Saturday 24 May 2014 12:31:26 David Edmundson wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> > On Saturday 24 May 2014 00:23:45 David Edmundson wrote:
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It ap
On Saturday 24 May 2014 12:31:26 David Edmundson wrote:
> > btw,porting the complete set is kdeplasma-addons is not optional for
> > future
> > release, because everything that's missing will be perceived as a
> > regression, no matter what we feel about it :p
>
> I really don't agree here.
> Som
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Saturday 24 May 2014 00:23:45 David Edmundson wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're
>> distributed as part of OpenSuse RPMs.
>>
>> Ca
On Saturday 24 May 2014 00:23:45 David Edmundson wrote:
> Hey,
>
> we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're
> distributed as part of OpenSuse RPMs.
>
> Can I confirm our position on what we're doing here, based on our
> conversatio
On Saturday 24 May 2014 00:23:45 David Edmundson wrote:
> Hey,
>
> we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're
> distributed as part of OpenSuse RPMs.
>
> Can I confirm our position on what we're doing here, based on our
> conversatio
Hey,
we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're
distributed as part of OpenSuse RPMs.
Can I confirm our position on what we're doing here, based on our
conversation last sprint.
1) They will not be released with the plasma release next month
I think
On Wednesday, May 18, 2011 15:50:29 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Mailing both lists as i'm not sure where the maintainer for this
> component is. Currently, using both Marble master and Plasma Addons
> master, I am unable to build Plasma Addons due to the following
> comp
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 05:50:29 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Mailing both lists as i'm not sure where the maintainer for this
> component is. Currently, using both Marble master and Plasma Addons
> master, I am unable to build Plasma Addons due to the following
> compila
Hi,
Mailing both lists as i'm not sure where the maintainer for this
component is. Currently, using both Marble master and Plasma Addons
master, I am unable to build Plasma Addons due to the following
compilation failure:
[ 93%] Building CXX object
wallpapers/marble/CMake
a light version,
the keyboardLed-applet, in review. The keyboardLed-applet does only allow a
subset of what the kbstate-applet does and also does not allow to set the
modifiers. See here also http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165402
So, question is; can we probably get it into plasma-addons
49 matches
Mail list logo
