Re: Plamsa Stable Build.kde.org failures

2016-07-01 Thread David Edmundson
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:41 PM, David Edmundson > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Ben Cooksley > wrote: > >> > >> Hi David, > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:50 AM, David Edmundson > >> wrote: > >> > I wanted to write u

Re: Plamsa Stable Build.kde.org failures

2016-07-01 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:41 PM, David Edmundson wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> Hi David, >> >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:50 AM, David Edmundson >> wrote: >> > I wanted to write up why Plasma stable is failing on CI so that we have >> > a >> > written down

Re: Plamsa Stable Build.kde.org failures

2016-07-01 Thread David Edmundson
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > Hi David, > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:50 AM, David Edmundson > wrote: > > I wanted to write up why Plasma stable is failing on CI so that we have a > > written down record. (and so we don't keep getting told off by sysadmins > for > > not

Re: Plamsa Stable Build.kde.org failures

2016-06-30 Thread Ben Cooksley
Hi David, On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:50 AM, David Edmundson wrote: > I wanted to write up why Plasma stable is failing on CI so that we have a > written down record. (and so we don't keep getting told off by sysadmins for > not fixing it) Sorry if it seems like we've done that. I don't see any is

Re: Plamsa Stable Build.kde.org failures

2016-06-30 Thread David Edmundson
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Marco Martin wrote: > On Thursday 30 June 2016 13:50:02 David Edmundson wrote: > > *Is there a short term plan:* > > > > Personally I think our our only viable short term options are: > > - forcing Qt5.6 on the stable branches of applications. Theoretically > it

Re: Plamsa Stable Build.kde.org failures

2016-06-30 Thread Scarlett Clark
LTS do not. However, it is you that decides what you want to support :) My time has shrunk significantly for volunteer work and I simply will not have time to revamp the metadata any time soon, so unless another volunteer steps up, bumping to 5.6 for all might be your best option. Scarlett On Thu

Re: Plamsa Stable Build.kde.org failures

2016-06-30 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 30 June 2016 13:50:02 David Edmundson wrote: > *Is there a short term plan:* > > Personally I think our our only viable short term options are: > - forcing Qt5.6 on the stable branches of applications. Theoretically it > won't break anything (though in practice who knows) > - turnin

Plamsa Stable Build.kde.org failures

2016-06-30 Thread David Edmundson
I wanted to write up why Plasma stable is failing on CI so that we have a written down record. (and so we don't keep getting told off by sysadmins for not fixing it) Plasma 5.7 requires Qt 5.6 The "stable-kf5-qt5 " layer on CI builds against Qt 5.5 *Can we set Plasma stable to use latest Qt/Fram