Re: New systemtray: beginnings and how to do

2009-02-19 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 19 February 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Thursday 19 February 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > > On Wednesday 18 February 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > > > ok, so we don't need a subclass of ksystemtrayicon, but something > > > > with roughly the same api, i'm going a bit blindly there

Re: New systemtray: beginnings and how to do

2009-02-19 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday 19 February 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > On Wednesday 18 February 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > > ok, so we don't need a subclass of ksystemtrayicon, but something with > > > roughly the same api, i'm going a bit blindly there because i still > > > never looked at both KSystemTrayIcon

Re: New systemtray: beginnings and how to do

2009-02-19 Thread Marco Martin
On Wednesday 18 February 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > > > ok, so we don't need a subclass of ksystemtrayicon, but something with > > roughly the same api, i'm going a bit blindly there because i still never > > looked at both KSystemTrayIcon and QSystemTrayIcon > > if you want to focus on the p

Re: New systemtray: beginnings and how to do

2009-02-18 Thread Marco Martin
On Wednesday 18 February 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Monday 16 February 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > > On Monday 16 February 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > > On Sunday 15 February 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > > > > this basic thing works fairly well by now, what is totally missing of > > > > co

Re: New systemtray: beginnings and how to do

2009-02-18 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Monday 16 February 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > On Monday 16 February 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > On Sunday 15 February 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > > > this basic thing works fairly well by now, what is totally missing of > > > course is the big part, the comunication infrastructure with the

Re: New systemtray: beginnings and how to do

2009-02-16 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 16 February 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Sunday 15 February 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > > this basic thing works fairly well by now, what is totally missing of > > course is the big part, the comunication infrastructure with the app > > (don't > > how to do this is going to be the big

Re: New systemtray: beginnings and how to do

2009-02-16 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Sunday 15 February 2009, Marco Martin wrote: > this basic thing works fairly well by now, what is totally missing of > course is the big part, the comunication infrastructure with the app (don't how to do this is going to be the big trick in all of this. the d-bus interaction is actually prett

New systemtray: beginnings and how to do

2009-02-15 Thread Marco Martin
Hi all, i've began to implement some pieces of the new systemtray spec (i'm trying to recall what we discussed and decided, so maybe still not perfect), for now i have a kded that watches all the apps that want a systray entry (to make it work across different plasma sessions) this is in playgro