2012/12/7 Aaron J. Seigo
> ah.. you got the message reversed!
>
> krunner may crash because it can load random plugins (runners) which may
> misbehave; krunner crashing would prevent the screen locker from
> activating.
>
> ksmserver does not load random code (because it has no reason to, and we
On Friday, December 7, 2012 13:13:49 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> It's just someone said that krunner could crash and we wouldn't
> have the session locked, then it was said it was moved to kcmserver
> and I got a bit scared of kcmserver crashing now...
ah.. you got the message reversed!
krunner may
2012/12/7 Aaron J. Seigo
> not only are you late to the discussion, but you apparently have not looked
> into how it is done: a separate process is started for the screenlocker /
> screensaver. it does not run in the ksmserver process. this is how it was
> also
> done in krunner .. and kdesktop b
On Friday, December 7, 2012 11:23:42 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> Sorry for being a bit late to this thread, but I need to say
> that moving the screen saver from krunner to ksmserver
> was a very bad decision, let me explain why:
not only are you late to the discussion, but you apparently have not l
Sorry for being a bit late to this thread, but I need to say
that moving the screen saver from krunner to ksmserver
was a very bad decision, let me explain why:
- Screen savers can be made by third parties,
meaning we can't guarantee their quality
- Screen savers might enter in some loop locking
On 03/12/12 14:42, Davide Bettio wrote:
> Nice, I missed that change. Is it possible to backport any fix for
> plasma-netbook?
Hacky fix for old versions of plasma-netbook:
http://randomguy3.wordpress.com/2011/09/04/screen-locking-with-the-plasma-netbook-interface/
Alex
_
On Monday, December 3, 2012 15:42:53 Davide Bettio wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Quoting Marco Martin :
> > in 4.10 is moved in ksmserver
>
> Nice, I missed that change. Is it possible to backport any fix for
> plasma-netbook?
no; use 4.10.
--
Aaron J. Seigo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digital
Hello,
Quoting Marco Martin :
in 4.10 is moved in ksmserver
Nice, I missed that change. Is it possible to backport any fix for
plasma-netbook?
Bye,
Davide Bettio.
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/
On Monday 03 December 2012, Davide Bettio wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think that screen locking should be moved away from krunner for some
> reasons:
>
in 4.10 is moved in ksmserver
--
Marco Martin
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https:
Hello,
I think that screen locking should be moved away from krunner for some
reasons:
1) When krunner crashes screen locking stops to work, an always
working screen locking is really important for security and privacy
reasons.
2) it seems that screen locking doesn't work while running
10 matches
Mail list logo
