On Friday 22 April 2016, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> > tried on the laptop so far, after a few fixes on the branch it seems to
> > work fine (not super familiar on all aspects of the app tough)
> > the only thing, i would then push the little change on the header api
> > that caused problems, for which t
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 06:37:38PM +0200, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Thursday 21 April 2016 11:38:25 Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> > > from my tests on the gallery app it seems at least not to have
> > > regressions (hopefully should work a bit better)
> > > if from tests looks like it works better, I'll mer
On Thursday 21 April 2016 11:38:25 Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> > from my tests on the gallery app it seems at least not to have
> > regressions (hopefully should work a bit better)
> > if from tests looks like it works better, I'll merge it shortly.
>
> Have you tried building Subsurface-mobile against
On Thursday 21 April 2016 11:38:25 Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> > from my tests on the gallery app it seems at least not to have
> > regressions (hopefully should work a bit better)
> > if from tests looks like it works better, I'll merge it shortly.
>
> Have you tried building Subsurface-mobile against
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 08:33:19PM +0200, Marco Martin wrote:
> Hi all,
> i think my rewrite of PageRow is almost done
> here's a review request on phab: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1460
> some test would be welcome, it should be pretty easy, just to switch
> to the branch
> mart/PageRow5.6
> in t
Hi all,
i think my rewrite of PageRow is almost done
here's a review request on phab: https://phabricator.kde.org/D1460
some test would be welcome, it should be pretty easy, just to switch
to the branch
mart/PageRow5.6
in the kirigami repo
from my tests on the gallery app it seems at least not to h
