On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday 07 May 2009, Richard Dale wrote:
>> Can you create Plasma widgets though?
>
> yes, several of the examples in scriptengines/javascript/tests/ do just that.
Ah yes, sorry I've found the code now in uiloader.cpp - I had thought
that
On Thursday 07 May 2009 16:52:10 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday 07 May 2009, Leonardo Franchi wrote:
> > > Yes because most of the applets, containments, shells, etc there
> > > depend on resources from kdebase-runtime.
> > > Only the script engines there are more independed and may be
> > > m
On Thursday 07 May 2009, Richard Dale wrote:
> I agree that the python and ruby script engine bindings have more
> dependency problems than QScript bindings, and it wouldn't make sense
> to put them in kdelibs.
well, none of the ScriptEngines are going to move to kdelibs. they are runtime
deps, n
On Thursday 07 May 2009, Richard Dale wrote:
> Can you create Plasma widgets though?
yes, several of the examples in scriptengines/javascript/tests/ do just that.
> Is it possible to have Plasma widgets in a .ui file?
that hasn't been added yet, no.
--
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
G
On Thursday 07 May 2009, Andreas Stricker wrote:
> Only the script engines there are more independed and may be
> moved further down?
the ScriptEngine plugin is a runtime dependency, not a build time dependency.
moreover, kdebase-runtime is, by policy, a required dependency to use any
applicatio
On Thursday 07 May 2009, Leonardo Franchi wrote:
> > Yes because most of the applets, containments, shells, etc there
> > depend on resources from kdebase-runtime.
> > Only the script engines there are more independed and may be
> > moved further down?
>
> Something else that just came up---plasma
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Thursday 07 May 2009, Leonardo Franchi wrote:
>> On Thursday 07 May 2009 11:48:48 Richard Dale wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Leonardo Franchi
> wrote:
>> > > hola folks,
>> > >
>> > > so i'm (finally) looking into adding scri
On Thursday 07 May 2009, Leonardo Franchi wrote:
> On Thursday 07 May 2009 11:48:48 Richard Dale wrote:
> > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Leonardo Franchi
wrote:
> > > hola folks,
> > >
> > > so i'm (finally) looking into adding scripted applet/dataengine support
> > > to amarok. it's really ea
On Thursday 07 May 2009 11:48:48 Richard Dale wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Leonardo Franchi wrote:
> > hola folks,
> >
> > so i'm (finally) looking into adding scripted applet/dataengine support
> > to amarok. it's really easy and transparent and all of that (yay plasma!)
> > but we ha
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Leonardo Franchi wrote:
> hola folks,
>
> so i'm (finally) looking into adding scripted applet/dataengine support to
> amarok. it's really easy and transparent and all of that (yay plasma!) but we
> have a minor issue. we depend only on kdelibs, and the scriptengine
On Thursday 07 May 2009 07:39:43 Andreas Stricker wrote:
> Hi
>
> >>> it would probably belong in runtime, actually.
> >>> kdebase/runtime/plasma/javascript?
>
> Yes, I'll appreciate this. This allows applications with
> Applet containers without the need for workspace.
>
> Plasma is a great Widget
Hi
>>> it would probably belong in runtime, actually.
>>> kdebase/runtime/plasma/javascript?
Yes, I'll appreciate this. This allows applications with
Applet containers without the need for workspace.
Plasma is a great Widget framework not stricly bound to be
only usable for desktop environments.
On Wednesday 06 May 2009, Leonardo Franchi wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 May 2009 21:54:19 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Wednesday 06 May 2009, Leonardo Franchi wrote:
> > > *-bindings package. But moving the javascript dataengine to the plasma
> > > in kdelibs would really be nice.
> >
> > it would prob
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 21:54:19 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 May 2009, Leonardo Franchi wrote:
> > *-bindings package. But moving the javascript dataengine to the plasma in
> > kdelibs would really be nice.
>
> it would probably belong in runtime, actually.
> kdebase/runtime/plasma/jav
On Wednesday 06 May 2009, Leonardo Franchi wrote:
> *-bindings package. But moving the javascript dataengine to the plasma in
> kdelibs would really be nice.
it would probably belong in runtime, actually.
kdebase/runtime/plasma/javascript?
--
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerpri
hola folks,
so i'm (finally) looking into adding scripted applet/dataengine support to
amarok. it's really easy and transparent and all of that (yay plasma!) but we
have a minor issue. we depend only on kdelibs, and the scriptengines are in
kdebase/workspace.
i understand that most of them hav
16 matches
Mail list logo
