On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 1:14 PM Nate Graham wrote:
> On 5/26/25 7:13 AM, David Redondo wrote:
> > Am Montag, 26. Mai 2025, 13:52 schrieb Martin Riethmayer:
> >> Hi all,
> >> [...]
> >> 1.) Do a "no-string-changed-bugix" release for .6
> >> Pro:
> >> - should not have any issue with extra branchin
On 5/26/25 7:13 AM, David Redondo wrote:
Am Montag, 26. Mai 2025, 13:52 schrieb Martin Riethmayer:
Hi all,
[...]
1.) Do a "no-string-changed-bugix" release for .6
Pro:
- should not have any issue with extra branching
- consistent with released schedule (not super important, probably)
Con:
- Hard
On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 1:23 AM David Redondo wrote:
> Am Montag, 26. Mai 2025, 13:52 schrieb Martin Riethmayer:
> > Hi all,
> > [...]
> > 1.) Do a "no-string-changed-bugix" release for .6
> > Pro:
> > - should not have any issue with extra branching
> > - consistent with released schedule (not s
Am Montag, 26. Mai 2025, 13:52 schrieb Martin Riethmayer:
> Hi all,
> [...]
> 1.) Do a "no-string-changed-bugix" release for .6
> Pro:
> - should not have any issue with extra branching
> - consistent with released schedule (not super important, probably)
> Con:
> - Hard to enforce / communicate
>
Hi all,
tosky raised an issue on the plasma-dev matrix channel:
Starting with Plasma 6.3, it is/was planned to have one extra bugfix
release (e.g. 6.3.6, 6.4.6 etc.), discussed at the Plasma Sprint (AFAIK)
[1].
The scheduling of the .6-releases, however, is currently planned to be
after the
