Re: GSoC proposal draft: network transparency.

2009-03-27 Thread Rob Scheepmaker
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 09:36:50 Fabrizio Montesi wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Keep in mind that right now I'm concentrating on the "using services" > > part of > > the library. I'm somehow "forced" to put the "exposing services" part on > > hold > > because

Re: GSoC proposal draft: network transparency.

2009-03-25 Thread Fabrizio Montesi
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Monday 23 March 2009 18:15:36 Rob Scheepmaker wrote: > > I've mentioned my interest in this GSoC project before. Now I've made a > > first draft of a proposal for GSoC. > > Excellent! Indeed :-) > > > A way to synchronize changes betwee

Re: GSoC proposal draft: network transparency.

2009-03-25 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Monday 23 March 2009 18:15:36 Rob Scheepmaker wrote: > I've mentioned my interest in this GSoC project before. Now I've made a > first draft of a proposal for GSoC. Excellent! I think the use cases and personae is very good, I'll just add some more information (for you, not necessary to be in

Re: GSoC proposal draft: network transparency.

2009-03-23 Thread Chani
> From here on, I will refer to the behavior needed by Charlie as copying > (it's just that: a copy of an applet/activity and it's configuration), > while the behavior needed by Alice will be referred to as sharing (changes charlie's copying sounds like it has some overlap with the containment-sav

GSoC proposal draft: network transparency.

2009-03-23 Thread Rob Scheepmaker
I've mentioned my interest in this GSoC project before. Now I've made a first draft of a proposal for GSoC. I'm looking forward to feedback: Network transparency in Plasma. Introduction The goal of this project is to make some parts of plasma network transparent with as end goal the ability to: