Re: GSoC Proposal

Hi Ajay, Good to know that you want to work on "Improvements and enhancements for Plasma Media Center". I think you need to take a look at how proposal look like, some of them you can find here https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1Iqk8MTix2CN1pAgqhZqhefKTwiA7P73zQH9N46lvyB0. You need to know

GSoC Proposal

Hi, I'm AjayKumar N Kulkarni who is having strong desire to participate in GSoC. So I've attested a draft of proposal. Kindly ping me back if any improvements are required. kdeproposal.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document ___ Plasma-devel mailing list P

Re: GSoC proposal : home automation

On Thursday 24 March 2011, Marsollier Robin wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I'm preparing my proposal for GSOC and I want some feedback. > > In last discussion about it, Luca Tringali proposed an integration with > Plasma Media Center, I think it's a very good idea for long term, but for > now, domogi

R: GSoC proposal : home automation

Nice idea, I would like to help in some way, but I'm awfully busy, so I'll probably do something, but I'm not able to partecipate at GSoC full time. Luca Tringali >Messaggio originale >Da: robin.marsoll...@etudiant.univ-rennes1.fr >Data: 24/03/2011 18.59 >A:

GSoC proposal : home automation

Hi everybody, I'm preparing my proposal for GSOC and I want some feedback. In last discussion about it, Luca Tringali proposed an integration with Plasma Media Center, I think it's a very good idea for long term, but for now, domogik is in way for its 0.10 release, PMC is also expecting its fi

Re: GSOC proposal for Plasma Educational Desktop

On Sunday 20 March 2011, karan pratap singh wrote: > Hi, > > With this I am sending the first draft of my Google Summer of Code proposal > for Plasma Educational Dekstop. > Please go through it and let me know where I can further improve it. > > A detailed critique would be nice if you have the t

GSOC proposal for Plasma Educational Desktop

Hi, With this I am sending the first draft of my Google Summer of Code proposal for Plasma Educational Dekstop. Please go through it and let me know where I can further improve it. A detailed critique would be nice if you have the time! http://www.box.net/shared/zknqba90p5

Re: GSoC proposal: First draft

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Viranch Mehta wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Marco Martin wrote: >> >> i'll mark the ones that are started, and should really really start >> porting them over git, meh >> >> while people start to do the ports, i think the branches where they >> live sh

Re: GSoC proposal: First draft

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Marco Martin wrote: > i'll mark the ones that are started, and should really really start > porting them over git, meh > > while people start to do the ports, i think the branches where they > live should be marked here near the plasmoid name > > Please get the re

Re: GSoC proposal: First draft

On Tuesday, March 15, 2011 22:27:42 Viranch Mehta wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Marco Martin wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Viranch Mehta > > > > wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > >> Marco: is there a list somewhere of the QML port

Re: GSoC proposal: First draft

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Viranch Mehta wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Marco Martin wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Viranch Mehta >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: >> >> >> >> Marco: is there a list somewhere of the QML porti

Re: GSoC proposal: First draft

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Marco Martin wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Viranch Mehta > wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > >> > >> Marco: is there a list somewhere of the QML porting status of plasmoids? > >> if > >> not, let's start on on commu

Re: GSoC proposal: First draft

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Viranch Mehta wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: >> >> Marco: is there a list somewhere of the QML porting status of plasmoids? >> if >> not, let's start on on community.kde.org. yes, it's a great idea and no, there still doesn is a p

Re: GSoC proposal: First draft

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > Marco: is there a list somewhere of the QML porting status of plasmoids? if > not, let's start on on community.kde.org. > > This'd be a good idea! Cheers, Viranch ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Pl

Re: GSoC proposal: First draft

On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Hayri Bakici wrote: > I think it's pretty good. You pointed out the reasons of your doings, > which imo are really important. Last year, I wrote two use cases in my > proposal, however I don't know if something like that really fits in > yours. > > Well, the plasm

Re: GSoC proposal: First draft

I think it's pretty good. You pointed out the reasons of your doings, which imo are really important. Last year, I wrote two use cases in my proposal, however I don't know if something like that really fits in yours. cheers On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Viranch Mehta wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14,

Re: GSoC proposal: First draft

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Friday, March 11, 2011 19:28:13 todd rme wrote: > > Might it be good to start with the ones that are already in-progress, > > that way you can directly compare the the existing plasmoid code and > > the QML code and thus, hopefully, ge

Re: GSoC proposal: First draft

On Friday, March 11, 2011 19:28:13 todd rme wrote: > Might it be good to start with the ones that are already in-progress, > that way you can directly compare the the existing plasmoid code and > the QML code and thus, hopefully, get a feel for how to do the > porting? But the ones which are in pr

Re: GSoC proposal: First draft

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Thursday, March 10, 2011, Viranch Mehta wrote: >> Attached is the first draft of my GSoC proposal for the project: QMLify the >> KDE Plasma Widgets. Please review it and send me comments/suggestions. > > one

Re: GSoC proposal: First draft

On Thursday, March 10, 2011, Viranch Mehta wrote: > Attached is the first draft of my GSoC proposal for the project: QMLify the > KDE Plasma Widgets. Please review it and send me comments/suggestions. one thing i'd suggest is priortizing and annotating the list of target plasmoids.

GSoC proposal: First draft

Hi, Attached is the first draft of my GSoC proposal for the project: QMLify the KDE Plasma Widgets. Please review it and send me comments/suggestions. Regards, Viranch GSoC Project Proposal = Name: Viranch Mehta Email: viranch.me...@gmail.com IRC nick

Subject: Re: [GSoC] Proposal: Authentication for scripted plasmoid downloaded from the web

Hi all, I've updated again the proposal about scripted plasmoid authentication to better match the emerging needs :) As usual, any feedback/advice is very appreciated! Cheers, -- Diego Link: http://socghop.appspot.com/gsoc/student_proposal/show/google/gsoc2010/diego_casella/t127038771188

Re: [GSoC Proposal] Plasma widget sharing using telepathy

On April 6, 2010, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote: > Plasma already allows to share widgets on the local network using > avahi/zeroconf. I think that a cool feature could be to use StreamTubes > to allow the widget to be shared with your contacts using your favourite > im protocol. That should not be

[GSoC Proposal] Plasma widget sharing using telepathy

Hello, I've been discussing on #kde-telepathy with grundleborg and drf__ about a GSoC project that will take telepathy tubes to kde. Telepathy Tubes are a user-to-user or user-to-group networking layer which applications can use to perform contact-to-contact data transfer. There are currently two

Re: Subject: Re: Subject: Re: [GSoC] Proposal: Authentication for scripted plasmoid downloaded from the web

> -- Messaggio inoltrato -- > From: Chani > To: plasma-devel@kde.org > Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:52:07 -0700 > Subject: Re: Subject: Re: [GSoC] Proposal: Authentication for scripted > plasmoid downloaded from the web > On April 5, 2010 15:33:00 Diego Casell

Re: Subject: Re: [GSoC] Proposal: Authentication for scripted plasmoid downloaded from the web

On April 5, 2010 15:33:00 Diego Casella ([Po]lentino) wrote: > Hi all, > after reading some comments on my proposal, I've performed a couple of > changes on the implementation details and the timeline, so it should fit > better the GSoC schedule now :) > To be more precise, I've also included impro

Subject: Re: [GSoC] Proposal: Authentication for scripted plasmoid downloaded from the web

Hi all, after reading some comments on my proposal, I've performed a couple of changes on the implementation details and the timeline, so it should fit better the GSoC schedule now :) To be more precise, I've also included improving PlasMate in order to show a widget to easily create and manage the

Subject: Re: [GSoC] Proposal: Authentication for scripted plasmoid downloaded from the web

> > -- Messaggio inoltrato -- > From: Chani > To: plasma-devel@kde.org > Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 10:56:42 -0700 > Subject: Re: [GSoC] Proposal: Authentication for scripted plasmoid > downloaded from the web > On April 4, 2010 06:39:10 Diego Casella ([Po]len

Re: [GSoC] Proposal: Authentication for scripted plasmoid downloaded from the web

On April 4, 2010, Marco Martin wrote: > This is a must have and was in the todo since day one... > as Chani said i'm not sure if is better at Plasma Package level or at > a broader thing for all ghns stuff GHNS already supports gpg signing items. that still isn't enough, however, as we also will

Re: [GSoC] Proposal: Authentication for scripted plasmoid downloaded from the web

On April 4, 2010 11:02:30 Marco Martin wrote: > On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Diego Casella ([Po]lentino) > > wrote: > > Hi guys, > > sorry for being late, however here it is my proposal for this summer of > > code. > > Since, during PlasMate development, we talked a bit about the possibility >

Re: [GSoC] Proposal: Authentication for scripted plasmoid downloaded from the web

On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Diego Casella ([Po]lentino) wrote: > Hi guys, > sorry for being late, however here it is my proposal for this summer of > code. > Since, during PlasMate development, we talked a bit about the possibility to > verify the plasmoids downloaded from kde-look.org or open

Re: [GSoC] Proposal: Authentication for scripted plasmoid downloaded from the web

On April 4, 2010 06:39:10 Diego Casella ([Po]lentino) wrote: > Hi guys, > sorry for being late, however here it is my proposal for this summer of > code. > Since, during PlasMate development, we talked a bit about the possibility > to verify the plasmoids downloaded from kde-look.org or opendesktop

[GSoC] Proposal: Authentication for scripted plasmoid downloaded from the web

Hi guys, sorry for being late, however here it is my proposal for this summer of code. Since, during PlasMate development, we talked a bit about the possibility to verify the plasmoids downloaded from kde-look.org or opendesktop.org, I think about it for a while and I came whit the idea to improve

Re: GSoC Proposal - basKet KDE SC 4 port

On Sat 27 February 2010 2:03:15 pm Ryan Rix wrote: > A few weeks ago, I wrote a blog post detailing an idea of mine to port KDE > SC 3's basKet note taking application to KDE SC 4, and in the process > taking advantage of the various technologies that have evolved since > basKet's last official

GSoC Proposal - basKet KDE SC 4 port

Hello everyone, A few weeks ago, I wrote a blog post detailing an idea of mine to port KDE SC 3's basKet note taking application to KDE SC 4, and in the process taking advantage of the various technologies that have evolved since basKet's last official release.[1] Recently, I've begun work on

Gsoc Proposal Telepathy-Plasma Integration

Hi guys. I was studying the telepathy framework and finished my Gsoc proposal. Please could you provide some feedback , suggestions on this? http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dcg3n3b6_7f7337bfk I already received some comments from a Decibel developer about the telepathy part, but would like to

Re: GSoC Proposal - Plasmate Widget templates

Hi! On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Michał Borek wrote: > I'm interesing in joining to GSoC this year. Please tell me what you > think about this proposal to Plasmate improvements. I'm the new one in > KDE community so please be forgiving :) Welcome to Plasma and KDE =) > Little abstract: > Us

GSoC Proposal - Plasmate Widget templates

Hello I'm interesing in joining to GSoC this year. Please tell me what you think about this proposal to Plasmate improvements. I'm the new one in KDE community so please be forgiving :) Little abstract: "Development and use of plasmoids should be as easy as possible. Making development of plasmo

Re: [gsoc] proposal: containment-mouse interaction

On March 26, 2009 21:17:08 Chani wrote: > http://chani.ccdevnet.org/soc-application-2009.txt > btw, I've submitted this to the gsoc site now. :) -- This message brought to you by eevil bananas and the number 3. www.chani3.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: GSoC proposal draft: network transparency.

On Wednesday 25 March 2009 09:36:50 Fabrizio Montesi wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Keep in mind that right now I'm concentrating on the "using services" > > part of > > the library. I'm somehow "forced" to put the "exposing services" part on > > hold > > because

[gsoc] proposal: containment-mouse interaction

http://chani.ccdevnet.org/soc-application-2009.txt I need to redo the ui mockup, but I've got a week's worth of homework to do this weekend, so.. it'll have to wait a bit :/ -- This message brought to you by eevil bananas and the number 3. www.chani3.com signature.asc Description: This is a d

Re: [gsoc] proposal for Media Center mode for Plasma

I'm already considering not using lightmediascanner and, instead, integrating with Amarok and/or Nepomuk -- André Barros Braga ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

[gsoc] proposal for Media Center mode for Plasma

Hi, I've just finished my proposal for gsoc for Media Center components for Plasma. I would be very pleased if you could take a look at it and tell me what you think!!! here it is: http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dd3jfdtw_30df74wxhm thanks, braga -- André Barros Braga ___

Re: RFC on my (unfinished) gsoc-proposal

On Wednesday 25. March 2009 13:28:01 Artur Souza(MoRpHeUz) wrote: > Hi Sandsmark! And good morning to you ! Sorry for the late answer, but I was a bit pre-occupied yesterday. > It would be nice if you could do Part I and II before GSoC actually starts > as part of your study so you can keep focus

Re: RFC on my (unfinished) gsoc-proposal

Hi Sandsmark! On Tuesday 24 March 2009 20:30:26 Martin T. Sandsmark wrote: > Compliment of the day and how is life general with you? Fine thanks =D you ? > It would be really nice if anyone had any feedback; what is not clear or > could be formulated better, that kind of stuff. It would be nice

Re: GSoC proposal draft: network transparency.

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Monday 23 March 2009 18:15:36 Rob Scheepmaker wrote: > > I've mentioned my interest in this GSoC project before. Now I've made a > > first draft of a proposal for GSoC. > > Excellent! Indeed :-) > > > A way to synchronize changes betwee

Re: GSoC proposal draft: network transparency.

, not necessary to be in the GSoc proposal) on the parts about the Qt/Jolie integration. > Requirements > This section contains an overview of the components that are needed. > Network transparent Plasma::DataEngine and Plasma::Service. I will use > Kevin Otten's services framework

RFC on my (unfinished) gsoc-proposal

Good evening to you all, good Madams and Sirs! Compliment of the day and how is life general with you? I plan on submitting a proposal for writing a Plasma-oriented IDE, Plasmate. Some of the excellent Plasma-developers have already started on it, with a lot of nice ideas and even a skeleton im

Re: Suggestions on my GSoC proposal

Thanks everybody for the feedback. This is the first time I'm doing this, so it's very important to me to hear from you guys - I listened to every suggestion you gave me. here is the link to the updated proposal: http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=ddxppm45_13cc2rrqcw The things I corrected were relate

Re: Suggestions on my GSoC proposal

On Tuesday 24 March 2009, Ana Cecília Martins Barbosa wrote: > Here is the link: http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=ddxppm45_13cc2rrqcw welcome to the project; thanks for the SoC proposal. now let's do a pros and cons list! :) pros: * i like that you are planning on starting with user research, and

Re: Suggestions on my GSoC proposal

On Tuesday 24 March 2009, Ana Cecília Martins Barbosa wrote: > Hey, could someone take a look on my GSoC proposal to the New Widget > Explorer project and maybe suggest anything? :) > Here is the link: http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=ddxppm45_13cc2rrqcw > > thanks in advance, > &g

Re: Suggestions on my GSoC proposal

Hi Annie, Before I start, I want you to welcome you to KDE and Plasma, and to say that everything I write here is solely my point of view, and doesn't need to reflect the opinion of other Plasma mentors. I needed to write the statement above since most of the time I sound to harsh while I'm no

Suggestions on my GSoC proposal

Hey, could someone take a look on my GSoC proposal to the New Widget Explorer project and maybe suggest anything? :) Here is the link: http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=ddxppm45_13cc2rrqcw thanks in advance, annieC ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma

Re: GSoC proposal draft: network transparency.

> From here on, I will refer to the behavior needed by Charlie as copying > (it's just that: a copy of an applet/activity and it's configuration), > while the behavior needed by Alice will be referred to as sharing (changes charlie's copying sounds like it has some overlap with the containment-sav

GSoC proposal draft: network transparency.

I've mentioned my interest in this GSoC project before. Now I've made a first draft of a proposal for GSoC. I'm looking forward to feedback: Network transparency in Plasma. Introduction The goal of this project is to make some parts of plasma network transparent with as end goal the ability to: