On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Friday 01 April 2011, todd rme wrote:
>> I think you are misunderstanding my suggestion. The suggestion is
>> that, as part of the QMLifying of the kickoff widget, you first create
>> separate widgets for each of the kickoff tabs, then use
On Friday 01 April 2011, todd rme wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Viranch Mehta
wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:51 PM, todd rme wrote:
> >> kickoff? I personally would like having a favorites or places widget.
> >
> > Oh that's a good idea. I've actually wanted to h
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Viranch Mehta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:51 PM, todd rme wrote:
>>
>> kickoff? I personally would like having a favorites or places widget.
>
> Oh that's a good idea. I've actually wanted to have places plasmoid since
> long. But I want to first c
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:51 PM, todd rme wrote:
> kickoff? I personally would like having a favorites or places widget.
>
> Oh that's a good idea. I've actually wanted to have places plasmoid since
long. But I want to first complete the default plasmoids in this GSoC, and
then move on to
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Artur de Souza wrote:
>
> Quoting Marco Martin :
>> to me the proposal seems quite good now
>
> +1.
>
> I would only change to make kickoff one of the last ones. I didn't
> touch kickoff's code, but maybe it's a little complex and it's better
> to finish others tha
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Artur de Souza wrote:
>
> Quoting Marco Martin :
> > to me the proposal seems quite good now
>
> +1.
>
> I would only change to make kickoff one of the last ones. I didn't
> touch kickoff's code, but maybe it's a little complex and it's better
> to finish oth
Quoting Marco Martin :
> to me the proposal seems quite good now
+1.
I would only change to make kickoff one of the last ones. I didn't
touch kickoff's code, but maybe it's a little complex and it's better
to finish others that are simpler first?
Cheers,
--
---
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Viranch Mehta wrote:
> Hi,
> I have modified my proposal according to the feedbacks. Please review the
> final version:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19zZn2ObkGWFRVOjaaVu1qp54Olb7g50FN6RgyAQhFm0/edit?hl=en&authkey=CKPlh6oP
> Thanks,
> Viranch
to me the prop
Hi,
I have modified my proposal according to the feedbacks. Please review the
final version:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/19zZn2ObkGWFRVOjaaVu1qp54Olb7g50FN6RgyAQhFm0/edit?hl=en&authkey=CKPlh6oP
Thanks,
Viranch
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma
Hi Marco,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> please also state that you will work together whoever will write the plasma
> qtcomponents set (hope there will be a separate gsoc for that, could end up
> be
> necessary you to work also on them...)
>
>
Could you please give me so
Hi Viranch,
On Tuesday, March 29, 2011 16:39:10 Viranch Mehta wrote:> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011
at 3:20 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > I thin the focus should be on:
> >
> > - Port Plasmoids visual appearance and interaction to QML and JavaScript
> >
> > This tempts me to mention about QGraphicsVi
Hi Sebas,
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> I thin the focus should be on:
>
> - Port Plasmoids visual appearance and interaction to QML and JavaScript
>
> This tempts me to mention about QGraphicsView (so that it is specifically
clear that from what the plasmoids are go
Hi Viranch,
On Monday, March 28, 2011 13:07:39 Viranch Mehta wrote:
> Please review my proposal for GSoC project QMLify Plasmoids:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19zZn2ObkGWFRVOjaaVu1qp54Olb7g50FN6RgyAQ
> hFm0/edit?hl=en&authkey=CKPlh6oP
>
> I've specified the order of plasmoids that I thin
On Monday 28 March 2011, Viranch Mehta wrote:
> > please also state that you will work together whoever will write the
> > plasma qtcomponents set (hope there will be a separate gsoc for that,
> > could end up be
> > necessary you to work also on them...)
> >
> > If qtcomponents gsoc doesn't get i
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
>
> Hi,
> the proposal is good, it should be a bit more elaborate tough.
> the "qmlfy" term was used just for fun, however the official proposal
> should
> have a bit more serious name, like "QML port of workspace and addons
> plasmoids"
>
> My
On Monday 28 March 2011, Viranch Mehta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review my proposal for GSoC project QMLify Plasmoids:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19zZn2ObkGWFRVOjaaVu1qp54Olb7g50FN6RgyAQ
> hFm0/edit?hl=en&authkey=CKPlh6oP
>
> I've specified the order of plasmoids that I think would be app
Hi,
Please review my proposal for GSoC project QMLify Plasmoids:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/19zZn2ObkGWFRVOjaaVu1qp54Olb7g50FN6RgyAQhFm0/edit?hl=en&authkey=CKPlh6oP
I've specified the order of plasmoids that I think would be appropriate in
increasing order of complexity.
Thanks,
Viranch
On Thursday 03 March 2011, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Thursday, March 03, 2011 07:12:07 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Monday, February 28, 2011, Marco Martin wrote:
> > > and, there is still quite a bit of infrastructure missing, (example:
> > > drag and drop)
> >
> > there are numerous plasmoids
On Thursday, March 03, 2011 07:12:07 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday, February 28, 2011, Marco Martin wrote:
> > and, there is still quite a bit of infrastructure missing, (example: drag
> > and drop)
>
> there are numerous plasmoids that do not rely on such things, however.
Yes, in fact I've b
On Monday, February 28, 2011, Marco Martin wrote:
> and, there is still quite a bit of infrastructure missing, (example: drag
> and drop)
there are numerous plasmoids that do not rely on such things, however.
pick the low hanging fruit first, document what's missing, fill in what's
missing, come
On Monday, February 28, 2011 16:17:27 Viranch Mehta wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Sure, but you'll have to be more specific. Which one exactly are you
> > talking
> > about?
>
> The ones residing
> in trunk/playground/base/plasma/declarative-applets/replace
Hi Shantanu,
> As Marco said, QML is pretty cool, but it takes very careful planning
> and getting used to. So it might not be as "simple" as it seems to be
> ;) I have experienced this while working on Calligra Mobile, so
> thought will share with you.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
Thanks for the thought ther
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> >
> > Don't underestimate that. QML is powerful and makes you more efficient,
> but
> > it still takes time to get things right (and not only "barely working").
>
> and, there is still quite a bit of infrastructure missing, (example: drag
> a
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
>
> Sure, but you'll have to be more specific. Which one exactly are you
> talking
> about?
>
The ones residing
in trunk/playground/base/plasma/declarative-applets/replacements/, say
rssnow. A friend of mine suggested me to soft link the ap
Hi Viranch,
As Marco said, QML is pretty cool, but it takes very careful planning
and getting used to. So it might not be as "simple" as it seems to be
;) I have experienced this while working on Calligra Mobile, so
thought will share with you.
Cheers,
--
Shantanu Tushar(UTC +0530)
http://
On Monday 28 February 2011, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Monday, February 28, 2011 13:47:00 Viranch Mehta wrote:
> > Also, it would SEEM to be a too small scale GSoC project if it only has
> > transforming 10-15 plasmoids (of course, it won't be easy).
>
> Don't underestimate that. QML is powerful
On Monday 28 February 2011, Viranch Mehta wrote:
> >
> > while libplasma2 will be designed around QML support, qml only plasmoids
> > are
> > supported since 4.6, and hopefully compatible (almost) with libplasma2
>
> So, the project will cover only transforming of current QGraphicsView
> plasmoi
On Monday, February 28, 2011 15:22:46 Viranch Mehta wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Try converting two or three plasmoids, that will give you a much better
> > idea
> > of what's involved.
>
> Very well :) Could you guide me as to how can I get the QML plasmo
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Try converting two or three plasmoids, that will give you a much better
> idea
> of what's involved.
>
Very well :) Could you guide me as to how can I get the QML plasmoids from
playground to run in place of the existing ones in tru
On Monday, February 28, 2011 13:47:00 Viranch Mehta wrote:
> Also, it would SEEM to be a too small scale GSoC project if it only has
> transforming 10-15 plasmoids (of course, it won't be easy).
Don't underestimate that. QML is powerful and makes you more efficient, but it
still takes time to ge
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Monday 28 February 2011, Viranch Mehta wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I know it has been a long while I haven't turned up with any work. I'm
> kind
> > of caught up with my semester very badly (not an excuse, I know). Anyhow,
> I
> > had some
On Monday 28 February 2011, Viranch Mehta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know it has been a long while I haven't turned up with any work. I'm kind
> of caught up with my semester very badly (not an excuse, I know). Anyhow, I
> had some very basic questions regarding the project implementation.
>
> 1. I have
libplasma2 only exists in the developers heads.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Viranch Mehta wrote:
> Hi,
> I know it has been a long while I haven't turned up with any work. I'm kind
> of caught up with my semester very badly (not an excuse, I know). Anyhow, I
> had some very basic questions r
Hi,
I know it has been a long while I haven't turned up with any work. I'm kind
of caught up with my semester very badly (not an excuse, I know). Anyhow, I
had some very basic questions regarding the project implementation.
1. I have learned that QML support will be/is being written in libplasma2
34 matches
Mail list logo
