On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 6:21 PM Nicolas Fella wrote:
> Hi,
>
> do we have any rules on the C++ standard used in Plasma?
All our rules can be boiled down to one point:
- Don't break distros
>Given that kactivitymanagerd is technically part of Plasma we even have
precedence of using C++17
Yeah
n the situation where a C++17 feature would
have been useful, but it always felt like requiring 17 just for this
particular case wouldn't be justifiable. I do however believe that if
you sum up all these minor occasions it becomes significant. I therefore
propose to formalize that using C++17 in
like requiring 17 just for this
particular case wouldn't be justifiable. I do however believe that if
you sum up all these minor occasions it becomes significant. I therefore
propose to formalize that using C++17 in Plasma is acceptable.
Several KDE projects already require C++17 (keysmith, kio
