As a contributor I would like to say using 5.18 is fine as long as there
are still active backports, but **using Qt 5.12** is problematic and
many programs has requirement on 5.15 nowadays.
To my knowledge openSUSE Leap 15.3 is still using Qt 5.12 to keep
compatibility with Plasma 5.18, as a r
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 8:28 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote:
>
> We've had a late request for 5.24 to be an LTS.
>
> We had previously said the final Plasma 5 release would be the one before
> Plasma 6, but there's no immediate sign of a Plasma 6.
>
> What do devs think of making 5.24 an LTS?
There's
I'm in favor.
A Plasma LTS release isn't much more work than a normal one, and it's
been 6 releases since the last LTS, which was also 6 since its prior
one. It seems like we kind of have an "every 6th Plasma release is an
LTS" thing going on. 5.12 LTS -> 5.18 LTS -> 5.24 LTS.
Nate
On 12/
On 22/12/2021 19:28, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> We've had a late request for 5.24 to be an LTS.
>
> We had previously said the final Plasma 5 release would be the one
> before Plasma 6, but there's no immediate sign of a Plasma 6.
>
> What do devs think of making 5.24 an LTS?
>
> Jonathan
FYI,
We've had a late request for 5.24 to be an LTS.
We had previously said the final Plasma 5 release would be the one before
Plasma 6, but there's no immediate sign of a Plasma 6.
What do devs think of making 5.24 an LTS?
Jonathan
