Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> yes, functions or methods. not data members (which i usually shortcut to
> just "members", versus "methods" ... probably what caused confusion;
> sorry.)
>
You're right. I read methods instead of members. Sorry for the noise.
Steve.
__
On Tuesday 21 October 2008, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > for those wondering what binary compat means for us, in a nutshell:
> >
> > * we can't add new members to the public classes (the dptr makes that
> > unecessary in the first place, of course =)
>
> Are you sure about this
Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> for those wondering what binary compat means for us, in a nutshell:
>
> * we can't add new members to the public classes (the dptr makes that
> unecessary in the first place, of course =)
Are you sure about this one?
Techbase says you can:
http://techbase.kde.org/Policie
On Monday 20 October 2008, Ryan P. Bitanga wrote:
> 2008/10/19 Aaron J. Seigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >* Multiple action runners
>
> Hey sorry I disappeared completely. I spent too much time previously
> working on KDE and neglecting my thesis that it ended up biting me in
> the ass. Anyway,
On Monday 20 October 2008, Ryan P. Bitanga wrote:
> 2008/10/19 Aaron J. Seigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hello =)
> >
> > the second thing we discussed at the meeting today was moving libplasma
> > to kdelibs and guaranteeing binary compatibility starting with 4.2.
> >
> > here are our notes from the
2008/10/19 Aaron J. Seigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello =)
>
> the second thing we discussed at the meeting today was moving libplasma to
> kdelibs and guaranteeing binary compatibility starting with 4.2.
>
> here are our notes from the meeting:
>
> Binary Compatibility and kdelibs
>* The Plan
>
Le Monday 20 October 2008, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
> On Sunday 19 October 2008, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Le Saturday 18 October 2008, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
> > > * Known issues
> > > * Service additions
> >
> > Hm, last time I looked at it, it was ok. Did it got much changes I
> > overlook
On Sunday 19 October 2008, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Le Saturday 18 October 2008, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
> > * Known issues
> > * Service additions
>
> Hm, last time I looked at it, it was ok. Did it got much changes I
> overlooked lately?
no, but i'll be adding hooks to "remote" a Service o
Le Saturday 18 October 2008, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
> the second thing we discussed at the meeting today was moving libplasma to
> kdelibs and guaranteeing binary compatibility starting with 4.2.
>
> here are our notes from the meeting:
>
> Binary Compatibility and kdelibs
> * The Plan
>
Le Sunday 19 October 2008, Sebastian Kügler a écrit :
> SvgFrame?
I'd say it's the best name proposed in this thread so far.
BorderedSvg is probably the second contender.
Regards.
--
Kévin 'ervin' Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
"Ni le maître sans disciple, Ni le disciple sans maître,
Ne font r
On Sunday 19 October 2008, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
> On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:15:03 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > BorderSvg/BorderedSvg
>
> Absolutely yes, BorderedSvg is much much better than PanelSvg.
> Another suggestion, FramedSvg?
>
> -Riccardo
FrameSvg,
i prefer something that describes the t
On Sunday, 19. October 2008. 17.08:36 Riccardo Iaconelli wrote:
> On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:15:03 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > BorderSvg/BorderedSvg
>
> Absolutely yes, BorderedSvg is much much better than PanelSvg.
I suggested the Border(something) because of Qt's Style Sheets. They have the
border
On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:15:03 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> or BorderSvg/BorderedSvg
Yet another one, StretchableSvg?
-Riccardo
--
GPG key:
3D0F6376
When encrypting, please encrypt also for this subkey:
9EBD7FE1
-
Pace Peace Paix Paz Frieden Pax Pokój Friður Fred Béke 和平
Hasiti Lapé Hetep Malu
On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:15:03 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> BorderSvg/BorderedSvg
Absolutely yes, BorderedSvg is much much better than PanelSvg.
Another suggestion, FramedSvg?
-Riccardo
--
GPG key:
3D0F6376
When encrypting, please encrypt also for this subkey:
9EBD7FE1
-
Pace Peace Paix Paz Fri
On Saturday 18 October 2008 20:15:03 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> or BorderSvg/BorderedSvg
+1
Alex
--
Proud KDE hacker: http://www.kde.org
Get KDE 4.1 - out now!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Plasma-devel mailing l
2008/10/19 Sebastian Kügler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:50:10 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> > or BorderSvg/BorderedSvg
>>
>> this is closer to the reality.
>>
>> personally i don't have a problem with PanelSvg, as i don't think there is
>> a "good" name for it. it's an odd duck
On Saturday 18 October 2008 21:50:10 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > or BorderSvg/BorderedSvg
>
> this is closer to the reality.
>
> personally i don't have a problem with PanelSvg, as i don't think there is
> a "good" name for it. it's an odd duck, and it'll have an odd duck name
> because of that.
>
>
2008/10/18 Aaron J. Seigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Saturday 18 October 2008, Ivan Čukić wrote:
>> > StandardSvg (It is pretty much the default..)
>>
>> -1 confusing like the present one
>
> -1 here as well, for same reason
>
>> > BackgroundSvg (I don't believe its used anywhere for foreground stuf
On Saturday 18 October 2008, Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > StandardSvg (It is pretty much the default..)
>
> -1 confusing like the present one
-1 here as well, for same reason
> > BackgroundSvg (I don't believe its used anywhere for foreground stuffs?)
>
> +1
it's really not about backgrounds, though. i
> StandardSvg (It is pretty much the default..)
-1 confusing like the present one
> BackgroundSvg (I don't believe its used anywhere for foreground stuffs?)
+1
or BorderSvg/BorderedSvg
Cheerio
--
There is a better way of life and it's not so hard to find
If you live and let the people in your
2008/10/18 Aaron J. Seigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello =)
>
> the second thing we discussed at the meeting today was moving libplasma to
> kdelibs and guaranteeing binary compatibility starting with 4.2.
>
> here are our notes from the meeting:
>
> Binary Compatibility and kdelibs
>* The Plan
>
Hello =)
the second thing we discussed at the meeting today was moving libplasma to
kdelibs and guaranteeing binary compatibility starting with 4.2.
here are our notes from the meeting:
Binary Compatibility and kdelibs
* The Plan
* libplasma, in its entirety, in kdelibs for 4.2
22 matches
Mail list logo
