Re: [nepomuk-kde] Some clarifications with nepomuk integration

2008-08-21 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday 21 August 2008, Richard Dale wrote: > why the lib needs wrapping. But once know where we are we should be able to > make SPARQL queries based on out current location, to geonames, dbpedia > etc, then and integrate with any data that is location tagged in our local > nepomuk store. prec

Re: [nepomuk-kde] Some clarifications with nepomuk integration

2008-08-21 Thread Richard Dale
2008/8/21 Aaron J. Seigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thursday 21 August 2008, Richard Dale wrote: > > 2008/8/21 Aaron J. Seigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > On Wednesday 20 August 2008, you wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Aaron J. Seigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > >> And, Loc

Re: [nepomuk-kde] Some clarifications with nepomuk integration

2008-08-21 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday 21 August 2008, Richard Dale wrote: > 2008/8/21 Aaron J. Seigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > On Wednesday 20 August 2008, you wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Aaron J. Seigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> And, Location awareness be implemented in a separate library ( ? ) >

Re: [nepomuk-kde] Some clarifications with nepomuk integration

2008-08-21 Thread Richard Dale
2008/8/21 Aaron J. Seigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Wednesday 20 August 2008, you wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Aaron J. Seigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> And, Location awareness be implemented in a separate library ( ? ) and > > >> plasma::Context will also be one of the consume

Re: [nepomuk-kde] Some clarifications with nepomuk integration

2008-08-20 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday 20 August 2008, you wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Aaron J. Seigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> And, Location awareness be implemented in a separate library ( ? ) and > >> plasma::Context will also be one of the consumers of it. > > > > right; the library most likely to be