Oops, I meant:
> But I have prioritized the reduction of effort required to create the new
> page, just by cloning another page in https://www.opendesktop.org/ .
___
Plasma-devel mailin
ns, that would multiply the subsections shown, and probably it
would overload the structure.
I made my proposal of sections and subsections based on the language, and
nobody said anything, but of course it is open to suggestions and
contributions. So you can make a detailed proposal of sections a
No answer for now :-(
I have re-sent the message directly to their email account, instead of by
web form.
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2016 at 4:05 PM
From: kdea
To: plasma-devel@kde.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: kde-libs.org, a repository of contributed libraries
I'm copying here the mess
ion of an app) to
http://qt-apps.org/ or to http://kde-apps.org/ , the page will
suggest to visit the new web ( http://qt-kde-libs.org/ ) to upload the
libraries contained in the app.
What do you think on this proposal? Would it be useful for the developer
community? (and so for the us
ns. Anyone? If not, I will ask to
http://opendesktop.org/ admins next weekend.
Thank you
kdea
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
libraries, classified by cathegories:
Qt 5 C++ libs
Qt 5 QML libs
Qt 5 C++/QML libs
Plasma 5 C++ libs
Plasma 5 QML libs
etc.
instead of having everything in one or two cathegories and mixed with app
cathegories.
Thank you
kdea
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2016 at 1:03 AM
From: "
he same idea. I'm happy to know that
plasma hackers had same idea as me :-)
Thank you
kdea
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
I really would prefer a repository/bazaar,
easy to use by all developers, and without any filtering.
The reason of the success of "http://kde-apps.org"; is the freedom of use.
Same would apply to a repository of libraries.
kdea
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
t could exist if developers had any reason to
create them, by separating the code from the main program and by
uploading the library to the repository.
> > - It seems to be an index of libraries, not a repository of libraries.
> It can be whatever we like. It's free software an
could be easily adapted to the
proposal.
Thank you
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 at 1:22 AM
From: "Aleix Pol"
To: "plasma-devel@kde.org"
Subject: Re: Proposal: kde-libs.org, a repository of contributed libraries
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 1:47 PM, kdea wrote:
> Hi, yesterday I
Excuse me, I sent the message in html format. Sending now in text format...
Hi, yesterday I published a new version of my "Take a break" plasmoid (
http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/Take+a+break?content=174127 ). It now
includes a little-but-useful library, "TextSize.qml", that contains a
de
Hi, yesterday I published a new version of my "Take a break" plasmoid ( http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/Take+a+break?content=174127 ). It now includes a little-but-useful library, "TextSize.qml", that contains a description and an example of use.
Is there any repository of contributed lib
On Monday, December 14, 2015 21:54:02 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> I'm very reluctant to add generic file I/O to our QML API, as that is going
> to make it very hard to secure it later on. We haven't redone the file I/O
> portions for that reason.
Personally I don't see much difference between a sta
Hi. One week ago I asked a question at forum.kde.org, but nobody responded, so
I'm now trying here in the mail list, please redirect me to the appropiate list
if this one is not the correct one. I'm copying the question...
Hi, I'm creating a QML plasmoid that will write data to a file in disk.
14 matches
Mail list logo
