Re: Review Request 124395: Test if signals are defined before using them

2015-07-19 Thread Scott Kitterman
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124395/#review82660 --- Looks good to me. - Scott Kitterman On July 19, 2015, 5:47

Re: Review Request 124290: Add missing licenses

2015-07-08 Thread Scott Kitterman
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124290/#review82238 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Scott Kitterman On July 8, 2015, 7:58

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, October 03, 2011 01:06:33 PM Dario Freddi wrote: > Hope this addresses your concern. It does, to an extent. I can see your point about some of the things I mentioned being equally orthogonal. I still don't see the tie to activities, but there seems to be consensus around it, so I'll

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sunday, October 02, 2011 06:44:41 PM Dario Freddi wrote: > I would like to draw your attention to the address of this list. It > has a nice -devel prefix. I don´t take part in discussions where I am > not knowledgeable about the topic. So far the answers I got are among > this category. > > -

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sunday, October 02, 2011 09:28:42 PM Dario Freddi wrote: > No, sorry to say that again. There are two categories of people: those who > know what they are talking about and those who don't. Your understanding of > this categorization is coming from the fact that you didn't understand what > I

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sunday, October 02, 2011 08:37:58 PM Dario Freddi wrote: > On Sunday 02 October 2011 20:31:37 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > And that's now exactly the point: if you don't have any clue about what > > is happening your "I want to save power and not let the computer > > decide" might be much worse th

Re: The case for a kdelibs 4.8

2011-09-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 08:01:00 PM Kevin Kofler wrote: > On Thursday 29 September 2011, Heinz Wiesinger wrote: > > From what I remember from the desktop summit the picture you draw here > > is > > quite an exaggeration of what is actually happening. > > > > kdelibs 4.7 is meant to be froz