> i don't think this is a distinction most users are capable of reliably
> making. this is why the dock concept as see on *Step and MacOS works at
> all, it seems
When I use MacOS X I have always problems to find some windows, the dock does
not help me, alt+tab does not help me and spaces+exposé a
> I mean that (if user enable option to connect notifications with tasks)
> when there is new notification, then icon (own if cannot be connected with
> window or that shared with task entry) starts for example blinking and
> notification (as widget with information) is shown after clicking on icon
> > associated with an app) and would, as Marco noted, mean that if i want to
> > see "that notification" i'd no longer have a well define place for that
> > to happen.
What do you do with notifications like "new message", "xyz requested kwallet",
"abc finished"? Either they are annoying and you w
Hi!
But when you want to keep notifications alive, see the status etc., a central
place is not very comfortable, for example you want to switch to Dolphin after
copying has been finished. Or you may want to switch to the application, close
it or access its systray-menu, because you have seen the
Please remove the other message!!!
> I like the idea of getting rid of systray icons (or taskbar entries),
> whenever systray icons also manage windows (amarok, kopete, ...). However,
> having one behaviour to icon and another for text would possibly confuse
> users, even because it's not very dis
> I like the idea of getting rid of systray icons (or taskbar entries),
> whenever systray icons also manage windows (amarok, kopete, ...). However,
> having one behaviour to icon and another for text would possibly confuse
> users, even because it's not very discoverable.
E.g. you could add a thin
