On Sep 7, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
> now i'm not sure about the current status of the tcp transport of
> dbus, but
> once it works i don't see particular problems, big endian machines
> would have
> to invert the bytes of the image by hand, that is something that
> somebody wi
On Sep 7, 2009, at 2:36 AM, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
>
> A name like KSystemTrayItem would avoid such confusions. I know it is
> probably not very appropriate because it describe a visualization
> rather
> than the content, but I feel it would still be better than
> KNotificationItem (Think about
On Sep 7, 2009, at 10:11 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
> At the moment, (should make it more clear in the spec) is ARGB and
> is not
> designed to be network transparent, so the endian should be the same
> of the
> machine for both the client and the server
I'd say this point was a HUGE red flag.
