On Wed, Jan 8, 2025, at 6:24 PM, Nate Graham wrote:
> On 1/3/25 8:17 AM, Nicolas Fella wrote:
> > Am 30.12.24 um 18:51 schrieb Nate Graham:
> >> A long term concern I have is that it's messy and unpleasant to have
> >> default styling data scattered across so many places. Ideally we'd be
> >> able
On 1/3/25 8:17 AM, Nicolas Fella wrote:
Am 30.12.24 um 18:51 schrieb Nate Graham:
A long term concern I have is that it's messy and unpleasant to have
default styling data scattered across so many places. Ideally we'd be
able to centralize *all* data about a particular style in a single
repo, so
On 12/31/24 4:59 AM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Montag, 30. Dezember 2024 18:51:39 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Nate Graham
wrote:
A long term concern I have is that it's messy and unpleasant to have
default styling data scattered across so many places. Ideally we'd be
able to centralize *all* data
Am 08.01.25 um 10:57 schrieb David Redondo:
Hi,
the original plan for Plasma 6.3 was to require Qt 6.8 (as the wiki currently
notes). However FreeBSD so far didn't gain Qt 6.7 and we never bumped it.
The first Beta is tomorrow. So I think we just go with 6.7?
David
I am rather annoyed that thi
Eww… I made libplasma depend on some Qt 6.8 functionality because the
wiki said it’s gonna be Qt 6.8. :-(
Am 08.01.25 um 15:17 schrieb David Edmundson:
The first Beta is tomorrow. So I think we just go with 6.7?
At this point, yes.
David
> The first Beta is tomorrow. So I think we just go with 6.7?
At this point, yes.
David
Hi,
the original plan for Plasma 6.3 was to require Qt 6.8 (as the wiki currently
notes). However FreeBSD so far didn't gain Qt 6.7 and we never bumped it.
The first Beta is tomorrow. So I think we just go with 6.7?
David
