https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341762
Raymond Wooninck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINF
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341762
Kai Uwe Broulik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WAITINGFORINFO
Status|UNCONFIRMED
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121581/#review72258
---
In general +1 to the idea.
I think it makes more sense to have
> On Dez. 18, 2014, 1:05 vorm., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > I think it's a useful component that can end up being really useful
> > elsewhere, therefore I think kdeclarative it's a good place to be.
> >
> > I'd say it would be better to have it in a separate qml module. IIRC, the
> > idea of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120965/
---
(Updated Dez. 18, 2014, 12:50 nachm.)
Status
--
This change has been
> On Dec. 18, 2014, 1:05 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > I think it's a useful component that can end up being really useful
> > elsewhere, therefore I think kdeclarative it's a good place to be.
> >
> > I'd say it would be better to have it in a separate qml module. IIRC, the
> > idea of
> On Dec. 15, 2014, 11:45 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> > Code looks good.
> >
> > Could you perhaps add an integration test for this? Since we are
> > "abstracted" by the socket it should be possible. If it is too much work
> > feel free to push it.
>
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> what do you
