Re: Plasma 5: Roadmap post 5.0

> > If we as distributors are not expected to ship it as a default desktop, is > > there much point in releasing bug fix releases? > > > > So why not—for the first months after the initial release—go for rapid > > releases that bring both bug fixes but also missing features that users > > will wa

Jenkins build is back to normal : plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #563

See ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Re: Plasma 5: Roadmap post 5.0

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 04:51:00PM +0200, Rohan Garg wrote: > Hi everyone > I was wondering, has there been any discussions on whether or not bug > fix releases for Plasma 5 will be provided after the 5.0 release? Or > will users simply have to wait for the next 5.1 release to get bug > fixes? > >

Build failed in Jenkins: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #562

See -- [...truncated 109 lines...] kemoticons - Branch master == Applying Patches === No patches to apply == Syncing Dependencies from Master Server == Configuring Build -- The C compiler

Build failed in Jenkins: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #561

See Changes: [me] BalooSearchRunner: use proper includes -- [...truncated 111 lines...] cmake - Branch master == Applying Patches === No patches to apply == Syncing Dependencies from

Build failed in Jenkins: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #560

See Changes: [notmart] take into account the plasmoid state at click -- [...truncated 111 lines...] knotifyconfig - Branch master == Applying Patches === No patches to apply == Synci

Build failed in Jenkins: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #559

See Changes: [aleixpol] Remove unneeded explicit dependencies -- [...truncated 111 lines...] kitemmodels - Branch master == Applying Patches === No patches to apply == Syncing Depend

Re: Plasma 5: Roadmap post 5.0

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Bernd Steinhauser < li...@bernd-steinhauser.de> wrote: > On 23/06/14 17:27, Martin Graesslin wrote: > >> On Monday 23 June 2014 16:56:55 Marco Martin wrote: >> >>> On Monday 23 June 2014, Rohan Garg wrote: >>> Hi everyone I was wondering, has there been

Build failed in Jenkins: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #558

See Changes: [notmart] add missing kconfigXT file [aleixpol] Move DesktopView code to DesktopView [aleixpol] Fix DesktopView cleanup [aleixpol] Code cleanup [aleixpol] Embrace the redundant output concept [aleixpol] Improve r

Re: Review Request 118763: Remove find_package(XCB) call as it is handled already by the top-level cmake file

> On June 16, 2014, 6:57 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > looks good to me, +1. Please add Hugo Pereira Da Costa to the Review > > Request, though. > > > > The review request made me wonder whether we still need to find XLib in > > Oxygen, though. The parts shown only use XCB, so maybe we could

Re: Review Request 118763: Remove find_package(XCB) call as it is handled already by the top-level cmake file

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118763/#review61017 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Hugo Pereira Da Costa On June 16, 2014

Re: Review Request 118940: Change SDDM theme installation path

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118940/#review61007 --- This review has been submitted with commit 26d57768bc80f7ed75

Re: Review Request 118733: Change installation path of sddm theme

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118733/#review61008 --- This review has been submitted with commit 26d57768bc80f7ed75

Re: Review Request 118940: Change SDDM theme installation path

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118940/ --- (Updated June 26, 2014, 10:31 a.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review Request 118733: Change installation path of sddm theme

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118733/ --- (Updated June 26, 2014, 10:31 a.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review Request 118940: Change SDDM theme installation path

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118940/#review61005 --- you're absolutely right, but the SDDM we have on the live CD i

Re: Review Request 118937: DesktopView: Launch krunner on typing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118937/#review61003 --- This review has been submitted with commit 9fd2842d78137a3c73

Re: Review Request 118937: DesktopView: Launch krunner on typing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118937/ --- (Updated June 26, 2014, 9:40 a.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 118933: PlasmaShell: Do not start krunner

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118933/ --- (Updated June 26, 2014, 9:39 a.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 118933: PlasmaShell: Do not start krunner

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118933/#review61002 --- This review has been submitted with commit fa096ebb7b2ab2740b

Re: Review Request 118933: PlasmaShell: Do not start krunner

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118933/#review61001 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Marco Martin On June 25, 2014, 10:58 a

Re: Review Request 118933: PlasmaShell: Do not start krunner

> On June 25, 2014, 11:12 a.m., Marco Martin wrote: > > Just to recap why it was decided to make it start by the plasma shell and > > to actually remove the autostart file (part of Ivan's Gsoc last year): > > krunner being present or not is something that depends from the shell ux, > > and one

Re: Plasma 5: Roadmap post 5.0

On 23/06/14 17:27, Martin Graesslin wrote: On Monday 23 June 2014 16:56:55 Marco Martin wrote: On Monday 23 June 2014, Rohan Garg wrote: Hi everyone I was wondering, has there been any discussions on whether or not bug fix releases for Plasma 5 will be provided after the 5.0 release? Or will us