On Saturday 24 May 2014 16:51:49 David Edmundson wrote:
> KDE 3.x had a clock with 5 pages of config tabs. It was not a great system.
>
> I don't think there's much wrong with doing one thing and doing it
> well. Swappable small parts iis what plasma does well.
Exactly! That's why I suggested (an
Hi folks,
first please apologize if this is already under way or done and I am just not
up to date enough :-)
Basically I was thinking about application scripting, allowing power users,
sysadmins, etc. to control or extend applications through built-in scripting
capabilities.
A couple of KDE
On Saturday 24 May 2014, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> From my just user perspective since I don't write any plasmoids nor
> plasma tech for a long thile, there are a few 'clocks' that should
> just disappear. Fuzzy, Binary, Digital and Analog should be merged
> together and plasma should have just one
Great, thanks. Bug reports it is. :-)
Andrew
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Eike Hein wrote:
>
> Feedback on visual glitches bugs is as useful as any other bug report.
>>
>
> What's more, poor visual polish is a critical barrier to
> adoption. Assuming we're of the opinion that people using
Feedback on visual glitches bugs is as useful as any other bug report.
What's more, poor visual polish is a critical barrier to
adoption. Assuming we're of the opinion that people using
our stuff is a swell idea, we should treat the problems
as important.
Developers tend not to because it doe
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Andrew Lake wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I just had a quick question. If I have some feedback on areas to visually
> polish up for the Plasma Next release, should I file a bug or just share
> them via the email list?
>
Bugs.
Emails get lost. Bugs don't. I think most of
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Saturday, May 24, 2014, Martin Graesslin wrote:
>> I support David on this one. I think we have better ways to spend our
>> development resources than to pick up some dead code and port it to QML.
>
> I think the best thing is to list the
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
>> On Saturday, May 24, 2014, Martin Graesslin wrote:
>>> I support David on this one. I think we have better ways to spend our
>>> development resources than to pick up some dead code
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Saturday, May 24, 2014, Martin Graesslin wrote:
>> I support David on this one. I think we have better ways to spend our
>> development resources than to pick up some dead code and port it to QML.
>
> I think the best thing is to list the
On Saturday, May 24, 2014, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> I support David on this one. I think we have better ways to spend our
> development resources than to pick up some dead code and port it to QML.
I think the best thing is to list the plasmoids there and prioritize, from
the user perspective, wh
In data sabato 24 maggio 2014 14:54:02, Sebastian Kügler ha scritto:
> +1 on all of the above. kdeplasma-addons is outside of our scope.
Should distros tell reporters not to report bugs against kdeplasma-addons for
the moment? For openSUSE I can take care of that if it is deisred.
--
Luca Belt
On Saturday, May 24, 2014 12:23:54 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Friday 23 May 2014 17:21:16 Andrew Lake wrote:
> > I just had a quick question. If I have some feedback on areas to visually
> > polish up for the Plasma Next release, should I file a bug or just share
> > them via the email list?
> >
> >
On Saturday, May 24, 2014 08:22:24 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Saturday 24 May 2014 00:23:45 David Edmundson wrote:
> > we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're
> > distributed as part of OpenSuse RPMs.
> >
> > Can I confirm our position on what we're doing here, based o
On Saturday 24 May 2014 12:31:26 David Edmundson wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> > On Saturday 24 May 2014 00:23:45 David Edmundson wrote:
> >> Hey,
> >>
> >> we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're
> >> distributed as part of OpenSus
On Saturday 24 May 2014 12:31:26 David Edmundson wrote:
> > btw,porting the complete set is kdeplasma-addons is not optional for
> > future
> > release, because everything that's missing will be perceived as a
> > regression, no matter what we feel about it :p
>
> I really don't agree here.
> Som
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Saturday 24 May 2014 00:23:45 David Edmundson wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're
>> distributed as part of OpenSuse RPMs.
>>
>> Can I confirm our position on what we're doing here, ba
On Friday 23 May 2014 17:21:16 Andrew Lake wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I just had a quick question. If I have some feedback on areas to visually
> polish up for the Plasma Next release, should I file a bug or just share
> them via the email list?
>
> I honestly would rather just pitch in and submit r
On Saturday 24 May 2014 00:23:45 David Edmundson wrote:
> Hey,
>
> we've started to get bug reports on plasma-addons. It appears they're
> distributed as part of OpenSuse RPMs.
>
> Can I confirm our position on what we're doing here, based on our
> conversation last sprint.
>
> 1) They will not
18 matches
Mail list logo
