Re: Re: Re: An alternative for XEmbed

2014-04-14 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Monday 14 April 2014 23:38:55 Aleix Pol wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > On Monday 14 April 2014 20:04:48 Marco Martin wrote: > > > On Monday 14 April 2014 19:51:02 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > > > On Monday 14 April 2014 19:19:33 Aleix Pol wrote: > > > > > Hi, >

Re: Re: An alternative for XEmbed

2014-04-14 Thread Aleix Pol
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Monday 14 April 2014 20:04:48 Marco Martin wrote: > > On Monday 14 April 2014 19:51:02 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > > On Monday 14 April 2014 19:19:33 Aleix Pol wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I've been using Plasma Next for the last days, and I

Naming unification for kamd

2014-04-14 Thread Ivan Čukić
In KDE sw 4.x, we had separate directories for everything, so I was able to call everything I wanted activitymanager without any prefix. But, that meant that some things had activitymanager in their names, some kactivitymanager, and some kactivitymanagerd. Since we are now a part of the rest of

Re: Re: An alternative for XEmbed

2014-04-14 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Monday 14 April 2014 20:04:48 Marco Martin wrote: > On Monday 14 April 2014 19:51:02 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > On Monday 14 April 2014 19:19:33 Aleix Pol wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I've been using Plasma Next for the last days, and I must say it's > > > really > > > annoying to get applications lost

Re: An alternative for XEmbed

2014-04-14 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 14 April 2014 19:51:02 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Monday 14 April 2014 19:19:33 Aleix Pol wrote: > > Hi, > > I've been using Plasma Next for the last days, and I must say it's really > > annoying to get applications lost on close, because they don't appear on > > the system tray and they

Re: RFC: plasma tooltips animations

2014-04-14 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 14 April 2014 19:12:50 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > I think these problems are fixable. First obvious question: do Tooltips use > PlasmaCore.Dialog? If yes I suggest that we move them to an own C++ > implementation - Dialog is a beast in interaction and we might have taken it > too far. KI

Re: An alternative for XEmbed

2014-04-14 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Monday 14 April 2014 19:19:33 Aleix Pol wrote: > Hi, > I've been using Plasma Next for the last days, and I must say it's really > annoying to get applications lost on close, because they don't appear on > the system tray and they expect to. > > Can we maybe figure out some alternatives so that

An alternative for XEmbed

2014-04-14 Thread Aleix Pol
Hi, I've been using Plasma Next for the last days, and I must say it's really annoying to get applications lost on close, because they don't appear on the system tray and they expect to. Can we maybe figure out some alternatives so that it's bearable? Aleix ___

Re: RFC: plasma tooltips animations

2014-04-14 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Monday 14 April 2014 18:49:59 Marco Martin wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm seeing more and more that one very big source of instability in plasma- > shell for me are tooltips, especially quickly passing the mouse over many > stuff that has a tooltip (making many move/resize event, many content > chang

Re: RFC: plasma tooltips animations

2014-04-14 Thread Aleix Pol
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Marco Martin wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm seeing more and more that one very big source of instability in plasma- > shell for me are tooltips, especially quickly passing the mouse over many > stuff that has a tooltip (making many move/resize event, many content > chan

RFC: plasma tooltips animations

2014-04-14 Thread Marco Martin
Hi all, I'm seeing more and more that one very big source of instability in plasma- shell for me are tooltips, especially quickly passing the mouse over many stuff that has a tooltip (making many move/resize event, many content changes) I don't know if is a driver issue (happens for me with catal

Review Request 117565: Expose the quit slot on KDBusService-enabled applications

2014-04-14 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117565/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Plasma. Repository: kdbusaddons D

Re: Review Request 117563: React to containment status changes

2014-04-14 Thread Marco Martin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117563/#review55747 --- with the kwin autohide thing, setVisible() won't work, what yo

Review Request 117563: React to containment status changes

2014-04-14 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117563/ --- Review request for Plasma. Repository: plasma-workspace Description ---

Re: Review Request 117455: [kglobalaccel] Remove Component::showKCM

2014-04-14 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117455/#review55725 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Aleix Pol Gonzalez On April 9, 2014, 5

Re: Review Request 117455: [kglobalaccel] Remove Component::showKCM

2014-04-14 Thread Martin Gräßlin
> On April 14, 2014, 1:25 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > > You can port it to QProcess as well, no? > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Yes, but why? What would be the use case for having it? It's rather > useless, isn't it? > > Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > It's public API... either way, go

Re: Review Request 116874: Patch for the next and previous button functionality in an inactive playlist.

2014-04-14 Thread Sinny Kumari
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116874/#review55718 --- checking only url of runtimeData will work only when PMC is la

Re: Review Request 117455: [kglobalaccel] Remove Component::showKCM

2014-04-14 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> On April 14, 2014, 11:25 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > > You can port it to QProcess as well, no? > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Yes, but why? What would be the use case for having it? It's rather > useless, isn't it? > > Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > It's public API... either way, go

Re: Review Request 117455: [kglobalaccel] Remove Component::showKCM

2014-04-14 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> On April 14, 2014, 11:25 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > > You can port it to QProcess as well, no? > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Yes, but why? What would be the use case for having it? It's rather > useless, isn't it? > > Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > It's public API... either way, go

Re: Review Request 117455: [kglobalaccel] Remove Component::showKCM

2014-04-14 Thread Martin Gräßlin
> On April 14, 2014, 1:25 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > > You can port it to QProcess as well, no? > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Yes, but why? What would be the use case for having it? It's rather > useless, isn't it? > > Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > It's public API... either way, go

Re: Review Request 117455: [kglobalaccel] Remove Component::showKCM

2014-04-14 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> On April 14, 2014, 11:25 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > > You can port it to QProcess as well, no? > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Yes, but why? What would be the use case for having it? It's rather > useless, isn't it? It's public API... either way, go for it if you deem necessary, won't

Re: Review Request 117455: [kglobalaccel] Remove Component::showKCM

2014-04-14 Thread Martin Gräßlin
> On April 14, 2014, 1:25 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > > You can port it to QProcess as well, no? Yes, but why? What would be the use case for having it? It's rather useless, isn't it? - Martin --- This is an automatically generat

Re: Review Request 117464: [kglobalaccel] Remove notification support

2014-04-14 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117464/ --- (Updated April 14, 2014, 11:27 a.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 117455: [kglobalaccel] Remove Component::showKCM

2014-04-14 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117455/#review55699 --- You can port it to QProcess as well, no? - Aleix Pol Gonzalez

Minutes Monday Plasma hangout

2014-04-14 Thread Marco Martin
Present: Alex, Aleix, Johnathan, Jens, Marco, Martin G, Vishesh Alex: * plasma full session * for the live ISO * next week solid powermanagement, last runtime split * please, everybody run a plasma next full session * we still need kscreen port Aleix: * finished kde-runtime splitting * next week,

Re: Review Request 117411: [ksmserver/screenlocker] Remove support for legacy screen saver

2014-04-14 Thread David Edmundson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117411/#review55693 --- Ship it! Ship It! - David Edmundson On April 7, 2014, 8:01

Re: Review Request 117417: [ksmserver/screenlocker] Port the locker library away from kde4support

2014-04-14 Thread David Edmundson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117417/#review55692 --- Ship it! Ship It! - David Edmundson On April 7, 2014, 9:09