---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115641/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Repository: plasma-framework
Description
---
Hi,
During the last sprint, it was decided to split KRunner out of the plasma
framework, since it seems like we want to use it but then there are a
couple of alternatives.
To that end, I created a new repository (kde:krunner) that contains the
relevant code and I'll remove it from plasma and add a
With that eloquent start I wanted to say that some of you may now we now have
our project page up and running (thanks to the webteam, Alex Fiestas and the
Sysadmins) vdesign.kde.org
We also have one open group at the KDE forums
http://forum.kde.org/viewforum.php?f=285 where anyone of you can
On Monday 10 February 2014, Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > the above points should be done..
> > only thing, in kactivities frameworks should still be merged in master
> > (Ivan, would this be ok?)
>
> Fine by me :) (even more than 'fine')
ok.
i suppose kdesrc-build has to be updated beforehand tough to p
> the above points should be done..
> only thing, in kactivities frameworks should still be merged in master
> (Ivan, would this be ok?)
Fine by me :) (even more than 'fine')
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailma
On Saturday 08 February 2014, David Faure wrote:
>
> * OK if I run astyle-kdelibs in both, to harmonize coding style?
> (drawback: it makes forward-porting changes from 4.x harder)
+1 if you can do it.
> + Can you add both to http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List?
> This includes figuring out
apart from re-implementation of lion mail , what about the other tasks I
mentioned , these are fine? these will also require akonadi client library
of kdepimlibs .
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Friday, February 07, 2014 19:25:55 Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > On Fr
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115623/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Repository: plasma-framework
Description
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115626/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Repository: kde-workspace
Description
--
> On Feb. 10, 2014, 12:03 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > Ehh, the "2" doesn't make sense anymore since the plasma library is now
> > following the kde frameworks version numbering. Right now it's version is
> > 4.96.0 and is going to be 5.0 once all of frameworks is released in it's
> > final st
On Friday, February 07, 2014 19:25:55 Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Friday, 2014-02-07, 18:26:20, Marco Martin wrote:
> > On Friday 07 February 2014 16:28:20 Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > > The GSOC idea referenced below is not about data at all, it is about
> > > state.
> > >
> > > Akonadi state informatio
On Monday, February 10, 2014 11:25:41 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Saturday 08 February 2014, Heena Mahour wrote:
> > Re implementation of lion mail is required in any case .
> > It is currently using data engine which is not the required tool as it
> > should use models throughout and all is based on
Present: Alex Fiestas, David Edmundson, Jens Reuterberg, Marco Martin, Martin
Gräßlin, Sebastian Kügler, Vishesh Handa
10th February, 2014, 12:00 CET
sebas
- plasmoids can now be dbus-activated (will blog)
- positive feedback to highdpi
- wants to merge themeswitch branch
- did some sketching fo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/#review49438
---
Ehh, the "2" doesn't make sense anymore since the plasma libra
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/#review49435
---
This review has been submitted with commit
cc34d2c17ef44f4aab
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/
---
(Updated Feb. 10, 2014, 11:53 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/#review49433
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sebastian Kügler
On Feb. 10, 2014, 11:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/
---
(Updated Feb. 10, 2014, 11:45 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks, Pl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115605/#review49429
---
I'd rather have it names plasmapkg2, the 5 prefix sounds weird
On Saturday 08 February 2014, Heena Mahour wrote:
> Re implementation of lion mail is required in any case .
> It is currently using data engine which is not the required tool as it
> should use models throughout and all is based on QGraphicsView .
just for completeless,
dataengines don't have any
20 matches
Mail list logo
