On Tuesday 24 December 2013, Mark Gaiser wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I decided to give a crack to an old pet peeve of mine (and quite a sore
> > point, if we look around in dataengines): integration of dataengines and
> > normal QAbstractItemModels
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> Hi all,
> I decided to give a crack to an old pet peeve of mine (and quite a sore point,
> if we look around in dataengines): integration of dataengines and normal
> QAbstractItemModels.
> Now, one could ask why not doing everything as imports
Hi all,
I decided to give a crack to an old pet peeve of mine (and quite a sore point,
if we look around in dataengines): integration of dataengines and normal
QAbstractItemModels.
Now, one could ask why not doing everything as imports of either qobjects with
an api or models.. fair enough and t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114634/
---
(Updated Dec. 24, 2013, 3:59 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114634/#review46140
---
This review has been submitted with commit
f97a0058da64b62f1b
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328597
Kai Uwe Broulik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@privat.broulik.de
--- Comment #2 from Ka
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114634/#review46129
---
Ship it!
Looks good to me.
- Sinny Kumari
On Dec. 23, 2013
