> On Nov. 7, 2013, 12:19 a.m., Teemu Rytilahti wrote:
> > I'm not actually sure whether is okay to force focus after any key is being
> > released...
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> Bug 319935 is probably the same issue, and also contains a patch at
> comment #1 for the "onReleased" function,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113697/
---
(Updated Nov. 27, 2013, 12:27 a.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
-
Hi,
according to a comment in a bug report[1], applications can specify an
"urgency" property with notifications, with the intention that
anything non-critical will automatically be removed after some time
idling in the notifications list.
Is this API still available with the QML notifications
> On Nov. 7, 2013, 12:19 a.m., Teemu Rytilahti wrote:
> > I'm not actually sure whether is okay to force focus after any key is being
> > released...
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> Bug 319935 is probably the same issue, and also contains a patch at
> comment #1 for the "onReleased" function,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114114/#review44552
---
This review has been submitted with commit
47340c61a68f0c7155a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114114/
---
(Updated Nov. 26, 2013, 11:41 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114114/#review44551
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sebastian Kügler
On Nov. 25, 2013, 6:30
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114059/#review44550
---
This review has been submitted with commit
201c66ce97bf683d818
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114059/
---
(Updated Nov. 26, 2013, 11:38 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114114/#review44529
---
Ping
- Martin Klapetek
On Nov. 25, 2013, 6:30 p.m., Martin K
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114101/
---
(Updated Nov. 26, 2013, 7:14 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
On Tuesday 26 November 2013 12:23:18 Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> In article <25673324.XNmJUoyzAe@martin-desktop> you wrote:
> > in todays hangout Alex asked whether kwin binary is going to be renamed to
> > kwin5 to make it possible to co-install plasma 1 and plasma 2.
> >
> > My opinion of that is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114059/#review44493
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Luís Gabriel Lima
On Nov. 26, 2013, 11:
On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 12:23:18 Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> In article <25673324.XNmJUoyzAe@martin-desktop> you wrote:
> > in todays hangout Alex asked whether kwin binary is going to be renamed to
> > kwin5 to make it possible to co-install plasma 1 and plasma 2.
> >
> > My opinion of that
In article <25673324.XNmJUoyzAe@martin-desktop> you wrote:
> in todays hangout Alex asked whether kwin binary is going to be renamed to
> kwin5 to make it possible to co-install plasma 1 and plasma 2.
> My opinion of that is, that we don't need to have things co-installable.
> After
> all kde-wo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114055/#review44489
---
Ship it!
looks good to me. I checked on Fedora 19 and translat
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114059/
---
(Updated Nov. 26, 2013, 11:26 a.m.)
Review request for Plasma and Luís Gab
17 matches
Mail list logo