---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112812/#review40934
---
Let me have a look at the patch; I'll be able to do it tomorrow
On Friday, September 27, 2013 19:37:57 Mark wrote:
> I think one can very easily expect a part called "private" to be just that
> and that it should not be included. If one does do that then that person
> deserves the pain when the private api changes. I don't think you should go
> to private.org.k
On Thursday, September 26, 2013 12:19:11 Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> Incompatibilities are okay, IMHO, as long as they really
> provide improvements and are not just bikeshed about e.g. function
> naming or wheel-reinventing of working specs.
even then, it’s often best to just use what is already the
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Michele Kipiel
wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 23/09/2013 alle 22.02 +0200, Aaron J. Seigo ha scritto:
> > On Monday, September 23, 2013 14:45:53 Michele Andrea Kipiel wrote:
> > > is there a preferred way to share documents in the mailing list? is an
> > > ubuntu one lin
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 17:51:41 Mark wrote:
> > Doesn't your naming proposal completely ruin the org.kde.* stuff? Up
> until
> > now i could fairly safely assume that all QML KDE imports where hidden
> > under org.kde.* but tha
On Thursday, September 26, 2013 12:19:11 Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> Maybe the persistent-notifications-after-reboot thing will be a
> (solvable) issue.
It's surely solvable, but is this really a problem? I don't think so, since
usually, the user shuts down the system which means, she saw the notifi
