On Wednesday 21 August 2013 19:36:21 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> 2013/8/21 Sebastian Kügler :
> > On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 17:12:10 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> >> 2013/8/21 Martin Graesslin :
> >> > Yes I noticed that for example you still talk about KDE as software in
> >> > your
> >> > blog post
Hi Plasma folks,
This thread has been fascinating reading. I hope that after you reach a
tentative conclusion, that you make a proposal to a list with a wider KDE
audience, such as the KDE-Community list. KDE-devel, KDE-core-devel and
KDE-Promo are some of the other possibilities to at least ping
2013/8/21 Sebastian Kügler :
> On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 17:12:10 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
>> 2013/8/21 Martin Graesslin :
>> > Yes I noticed that for example you still talk about KDE as software in
>> > your
>> > blog posts. To be honest I have to cringe if I read it, because it makes
>> > the
On Wednesday 21 August 2013 14:39:36 Rick Stockton wrote:
>
> BTW, as a (mostly) end-User, I'm fine (and prefer) Plasma-2. But KDE
> without "base" SC Releases will tend to fragment Distro content
> selection, right?
sorry, I have to be a bit tedious here :p
isn't this material for a completely d
I wonder: If KDE will not define and Release an internally consistent
'SC' anymore, then how should packagers differentiate between "Minor
Version" and "Point Release Updates" for their end users?
I understand the use of an RPM or Deb name such as "Task-KDE-Plasma"
used as a collection, defining
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 17:12:10 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> 2013/8/21 Martin Graesslin :
> > Yes I noticed that for example you still talk about KDE as software in
> > your
> > blog posts. To be honest I have to cringe if I read it, because it makes
> > the task of everyone more difficult who
2013/8/21 Martin Graesslin :
> Yes I noticed that for example you still talk about KDE as software in your
> blog posts. To be honest I have to cringe if I read it, because it makes the
> task of everyone more difficult who tries to work on the repositioning of the
> brand.
Well if I write an app u
On Wednesday 21 August 2013 15:58:03 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> 2013/8/21 Martin Graesslin :
> > On Wednesday 21 August 2013 13:52:06 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> >> 2013/8/21 Martin Graesslin :
> >> > On Wednesday 21 August 2013 11:29:52 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> >> > this might change. Consider Razor
2013/8/21 Martin Graesslin :
> On Wednesday 21 August 2013 13:52:06 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
>> 2013/8/21 Martin Graesslin :
>> > On Wednesday 21 August 2013 11:29:52 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
>> > this might change. Consider Razor/LXDE joining the KDE umbrella. What
>> > then?
>> > From one day to an
On Monday 19 August 2013 21:56:35 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> Other proposals, ideas, tweaks to the above most welcome, but let’s try to
> come to a consensus on this matter before the end of this month.
another idea: let's drop the version number completely and only use it
internally (bugtracker, lib
On Wednesday 21 August 2013 13:52:06 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> 2013/8/21 Martin Graesslin :
> > On Wednesday 21 August 2013 11:29:52 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> >> My 2c,
> >>
> >> On KDE 4 aka KDE SC 4, plasma was always just plasma,
> >> no user says I'm using the plasma shell (as there isn't anot
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112128/#review38288
---
This review has been submitted with commit
64505f15b9725d3d213
2013/8/21 Martin Graesslin :
> On Wednesday 21 August 2013 11:29:52 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
>> My 2c,
>>
>> On KDE 4 aka KDE SC 4, plasma was always just plasma,
>> no user says I'm using the plasma shell (as there isn't another
>> KDE option).
> this might change. Consider Razor/LXDE joining the K
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112128/
---
(Updated Aug. 21, 2013, 4:50 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112128/#review38287
---
This review has been submitted with commit
ab7b64e3a9c788814bd
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112128/#review38285
---
Ship it!
looks good to me
- Marco Martin
On Aug. 17, 2013,
On Wednesday 21 August 2013 11:29:52 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> My 2c,
>
> On KDE 4 aka KDE SC 4, plasma was always just plasma,
> no user says I'm using the plasma shell (as there isn't another
> KDE option).
this might change. Consider Razor/LXDE joining the KDE umbrella. What then?
>From one da
2013/8/21 Marco Martin :
> On Wednesday 21 August 2013, Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
>> My 2c,
>>
>> On KDE 4 aka KDE SC 4, plasma was always just plasma,
>> no user says I'm using the plasma shell (as there isn't another
>> KDE option).
>
> Incidently, the whole SC stuff, was never intended for marketi
On Wednesday 21 August 2013, Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> My 2c,
>
> On KDE 4 aka KDE SC 4, plasma was always just plasma,
> no user says I'm using the plasma shell (as there isn't another
> KDE option).
Incidently, the whole SC stuff, was never intended for marketing and public
communication, but
My 2c,
On KDE 4 aka KDE SC 4, plasma was always just plasma,
no user says I'm using the plasma shell (as there isn't another
KDE option).
I think even if Plasma is numbered after 2, users will still say
they have installed KDE 5 or KDE SC 5, the marketing imo
must go to the whole SC 5 and not to
On Monday 19 August 2013, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>
> Other proposals, ideas, tweaks to the above most welcome, but let’s try to
> come to a consensus on this matter before the end of this month.
>
> then we can all move forward in confidence together, whatever it is we
> decide.
after thinking ab
Hi! https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111849/ is updated, another patch is
there, which use custom config file!
Thanks everyone!
2013/8/4 Sebastian Kügler
> Hi Hu Zheng,
>
> On Saturday, August 03, 2013 11:42:22 Hu Zheng wrote:
> > Done! See:
> > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111849/
>
> Pl
22 matches
Mail list logo
