---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112105/
---
(Updated Aug. 16, 2013, 5:41 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112105/#review37914
---
This review has been submitted with commit
23f0363ba442f504e01
> On April 27, 2013, 2:09 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > Ship It!
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Janitorial dude question: Has this been commited and you forgot to mark
> it as submitted or it does still need submitting?
>
>
> Marco Martin wrote:
> should still be committed
Want me to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110626/
---
(Updated Aug. 15, 2013, 10:41 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
> On April 27, 2013, 2:09 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > Ship It!
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Janitorial dude question: Has this been commited and you forgot to mark
> it as submitted or it does still need submitting?
>
should still be committed
- Marco
--
> On May 23, 2013, 9:59 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > Ship It!
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Janitorial dude question: Has this been commited and you forgot to mark
> it as submitted or it does still need submitting?
>
it can be marked as submitted, yes
- Marco
---
> On April 24, 2013, 6:51 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > Ship It!
Janitorial dude question: Has this been commited and you forgot to mark it as
submitted or it does still need submitting?
- Albert
---
This is an automatically generated
> On May 4, 2013, 9:14 a.m., Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote:
> > The patch is ok, it can go in.
> >
> > Are you familiar with out git workflow policy?
> >
> > http://community.kde.org/Plasma/IntegrationBranches/GeneralPolicy
> >
> > If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask :)
Janitorial du
> On May 23, 2013, 9:59 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > Ship It!
Janitorial dude question: Has this been commited and you forgot to mark it as
submitted or it does still need submitting?
- Albert
---
This is an automatically generated e-
> On April 27, 2013, 2:09 p.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > Ship It!
Janitorial dude question: Has this been commited and you forgot to mark it as
submitted or it does still need submitting?
- Albert
---
This is an automatically generated
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108325/
---
(Updated Aug. 15, 2013, 10:03 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been di
> On April 5, 2013, 4:16 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Can you please attach the diff properly and not give ship its to yourself?
> >
> > I'd suggest you discard this review that is already broken and start a new
> > one where you attach the diff properly and you don't give you a ship it t
Am Donnerstag, 15. August 2013, 22:04:54 schrieb Marco Martin:
> On Thursday 15 August 2013, Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> > > patches welcome ;)
> >
> > Hmm, when I try to manually set the implicitWidth or route it
> > somewhereelse
> > it says "implicitWidth not available in QtQuick Item 1.0" (or so)
On Thursday 15 August 2013, Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> > patches welcome ;)
>
> Hmm, when I try to manually set the implicitWidth or route it somewhereelse
> it says "implicitWidth not available in QtQuick Item 1.0" (or so).
implicitWidth is available only since 1.1, so across the component the imp
> patches welcome ;)
Hmm, when I try to manually set the implicitWidth or route it somewhereelse it
says "implicitWidth not available in QtQuick Item 1.0" (or so).
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo
On Thursday 15 August 2013, Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > its implicitWidth should return a proper value (if it doesn't means the
> > component should be fixed ;)
>
> implicitWidth seems to return 0 for the checkbox item.
then needs to be fixed...
patches welcome ;)
--
Marco Martin
_
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112105/#review37872
---
Ship it!
Thanks for noticing this issue on KDE 4.11. Works fin
Hi,
> its implicitWidth should return a proper value (if it doesn't means the
> component should be fixed ;)
implicitWidth seems to return 0 for the checkbox item.
(If I could've just kept the switch … :P)
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112105/#review37870
---
Ship it!
meh, i changed it because some reported leaks since t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112105/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Description
---
In KDE 4.11, if you do not
However , the plasmoids appear on the desktop (plasma 2 ) momentary then it
shows an output plasma-shell(31515)/default onTriggered: Saved coordinates
for ToolBox in config: 992x992
plasma-shell(31515)/default qt_assert: ASSERT: "oldActiveFocusItem" in file
items/qquickwindow.cpp, line 735
Aborted
okayy on deleting ~/.config5/plasma-shellrc I got it .
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Heena Mahour wrote:
> export
> QT_PLUGIN_PATH=$KF5/lib/plugins:$KF5/lib64/plugins:$KF5/lib/i386-linux-gnu/plugins:$QTDIR/plugins#:$QT_PLUGIN_PATH
> export
> QML2_IMPORT_PATH=$KF5/lib/qml:$KF5/lib64/qml:$KF5
export
QT_PLUGIN_PATH=$KF5/lib/plugins:$KF5/lib64/plugins:$KF5/lib/i386-linux-gnu/plugins:$QTDIR/plugins#:$QT_PLUGIN_PATH
export
QML2_IMPORT_PATH=$KF5/lib/qml:$KF5/lib64/qml:$KF5/lib/i386-linux-gnu/qml:$QTDIR/qml
If I do echo $KF5/lib/plugins then it is giving /opt/kf5/lib/plugins
How can I be sure
On Thursday 15 August 2013, Heena Mahour wrote:
> Hey
>
> I am getting http://picpaste.com/screen13-GNKwWhEy.png this on
> plasma-shell. This is the output on terminal
> http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=zL2fMK8c Could you suggest how I may load
> plasmoid in plasma-shell ?
>
> Regards
Q_PLUGIN_PATH
Hey
I am getting http://picpaste.com/screen13-GNKwWhEy.png this on plasma-shell.
This is the output on terminal http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=zL2fMK8c
Could you suggest how I may load plasmoid in plasma-shell ?
Regards
--
-Heena
Season of kde'12 participant
Google Summer of Code 2013
Delhi Col
On Thursday 15 August 2013, Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I got a bug report [1] about that the popup width might get so small that
> the PM checkbox doesn't fit entirely.
> Is there a way to determin the actual width of the checkbox including its
> label?
> So I could do minimumWidth: Ma
This is the reason in Apper updater the checkbox
doesn't use the text property, instead I have a checkbox
with no text and a Text element next to it and eliding right.
I don't think you can do it other way as there is no
other properties exposed, but I might be wrong...
2013/8/15 Kai Uwe Broulik
Hi there,
I got a bug report [1] about that the popup width might get so small that the
PM checkbox doesn't fit entirely.
Is there a way to determin the actual width of the checkbox including its
label?
So I could do minimumWidth: Math.max( currentminimumwidth, checkboxwidth)
Or should I just us
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112088/#review37838
---
Ship it!
One R(ü|ue)diger has answered, you can commit it.
-
29 matches
Mail list logo
