Hi,
I've been teased by this bug [1] for years but never bothered to look into it.
I'm browsing through dozens of files, enabling debug output as i go..
but nothing extra gets printed. I used qDebug() just to be sure that i
didn't an "oops" ;)
Anyway, since the plasma code is completely new for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110465/
---
(Updated May 17, 2013, 6:05 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mark
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110465/#review32712
---
This review has been submitted with commit
e57a7dd679521d384fc
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110467/
---
(Updated May 17, 2013, 6:02 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mark
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110467/#review32711
---
This review has been submitted with commit
8a6f783dfd6f021173f
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110475/
---
(Updated May 17, 2013, 5:38 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mark
Ok I will commit it. About the comment, if you go by that reasoning, the
code will become full of unnecessary comments. So unless absolutely
necessary, you don't want to do that. If someone wants it back, there is
git ;)
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Akshay Ratan wrote:
> Hi,
> Yes I thi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110420/
---
(Updated May 17, 2013, 12:57 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110420/#review32696
---
This review has been submitted with commit
71fc7c112076ac2eb83
> On May 17, 2013, 12:10 p.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > this is fine by me then ... cheers.
Should it be backported to 4.10?
- Romário
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110420/#review32694
---
Ship it!
this is fine by me then ... cheers.
- Aaron J. Seigo
> On May 17, 2013, 7:33 a.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > the point of notifications are, obviously, to inform the user. if it hides
> > as soon as something else is interacted with, the user will miss many (even
> > most) notifications that appear while they are using the computer.
> > obviousl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110420/
---
(Updated May 17, 2013, 8:26 a.m.)
Review request for kde-workspace and Pla
> On May 17, 2013, 7:33 a.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > the point of notifications are, obviously, to inform the user. if it hides
> > as soon as something else is interacted with, the user will miss many (even
> > most) notifications that appear while they are using the computer.
> > obviousl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110420/#review32683
---
the point of notifications are, obviously, to inform the user.
On Thursday, May 16, 2013 21:44:02 Daniel Vrátil wrote:
> So...ideas? :-)
imho, in the 4.x libraries, we simply have to rely on applications to get it
right: if you have actions in your notification, make them persistent.
the notification applet could probably be improved to hide the actions onc
16 matches
Mail list logo
