---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107261/
---
Review request for Plasma and Marco Martin.
Description
---
Right now
>
> Did you actually understand what I'm referring to?
>
I guess that we all agree that we should replace the QDialog with the
KPasswordDialog (right?).
If so, how can we do that? Even if someone doesn't have the pinentry-qt4,
then the pinentry (CL)
is opening. And i wasn't able to remove the pine
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107001/#review21657
---
This review has been submitted with commit
08960f71610ffd869a7
On Thursday, November 8, 2012 20:06:10 Antonis Tsiapaliokas wrote:
> > - PasswordAsker sounds like could be implemented on top of
> > KPasswordDialog
>
> gpgme is using pinetry-qt4 for password prompt, i don't think that we
> should use the KPasswordDialog.
gpgme does this because pinentry-qt4 is
Alle giovedì 8 novembre 2012, Antonis Tsiapaliokas ha scritto:
> > - PasswordAsker sounds like could be implemented on top of
> > KPasswordDialog
>
> gpgme is using pinetry-qt4 for password prompt, i don't think that we
> should use the KPasswordDialog.
Did you actually understand what I'm referr
> - PasswordAsker sounds like could be implemented on top of
> KPasswordDialog
>
gpgme is using pinetry-qt4 for password prompt, i don't think that we
should use the KPasswordDialog.
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107209/#review21628
---
Ship it!
Good to go :)
- Sebastian Kügler
On Nov. 8, 2012,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107209/
---
(Updated Nov. 8, 2012, 2:05 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107192/
---
(Updated Nov. 8, 2012, 12:47 p.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
--
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107247/#review21623
---
This review has been submitted with commit
631d372c411f04bc086
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107001/#review21622
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Marco Martin
On Nov. 6, 2012, 11:36 p.m
> On Nov. 8, 2012, 9:33 a.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > style is quite ok to me now.
> > functions could still be changed to
> >
> > function foo()
> > {
> > ...
> > }
>
> Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> actually, the style was finally updated to:
>
> function foo() {
> }
>
> so
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107160/#review21618
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Aaron J. Seigo
On Nov. 7, 2012, 3:20 p.
> On Nov. 8, 2012, 9:33 a.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > style is quite ok to me now.
> > functions could still be changed to
> >
> > function foo()
> > {
> > ...
> > }
>
> Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> actually, the style was finally updated to:
>
> function foo() {
> }
>
> so
> On Nov. 8, 2012, 9:33 a.m., Marco Martin wrote:
> > style is quite ok to me now.
> > functions could still be changed to
> >
> > function foo()
> > {
> > ...
> > }
actually, the style was finally updated to:
function foo() {
}
so no need to adjust this :)
- Aaron J.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107001/#review21614
---
style is quite ok to me now.
functions could still be changed t
16 matches
Mail list logo
