Re: Review Request: Mouse hover effect on ListItem

2012-08-09 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> On Aug. 9, 2012, 3:17 p.m., Marco Martin wrote: > > i think it makes sense, two important things should be assured tough: > > a) on the normal case, with click disabled, the effect muct be disabled as > > well (it disables the mouse area so should work) > > b) now a touch version without effec

Re: Current state of System Monitor

2012-08-09 Thread Shaun Reich
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Peter Hartmann wrote: > On 07.08.2012 12:34, Shaun Reich wrote: >> >> >> Uh.. I've had a wip from scratch QML2 version of the system monitors in a >> workspace branch for a long time now. Obviously it can't be used until Qt5 >> is out. >> >> It has more functionalit

Re: Current state of System Monitor

2012-08-09 Thread Peter Hartmann
On 07.08.2012 12:34, Shaun Reich wrote: Uh.. I've had a wip from scratch QML2 version of the system monitors in a workspace branch for a long time now. Obviously it can't be used until Qt5 is out. It has more functionality than the current ones too. In the sense that it also has a bar graph

Re: Review Request: Mouse hover effect on ListItem

2012-08-09 Thread Marco Martin
> On Aug. 9, 2012, 3:17 p.m., Marco Martin wrote: > > i think it makes sense, two important things should be assured tough: > > a) on the normal case, with click disabled, the effect muct be disabled as > > well (it disables the mouse area so should work) > > b) now a touch version without effec

Re: Review Request: Mouse hover effect on ListItem

2012-08-09 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> On Aug. 9, 2012, 3:17 p.m., Marco Martin wrote: > > i think it makes sense, two important things should be assured tough: > > a) on the normal case, with click disabled, the effect muct be disabled as > > well (it disables the mouse area so should work) > > b) now a touch version without effec

Re: Review Request: Mouse hover effect on ListItem

2012-08-09 Thread Marco Martin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105939/#review17158 --- i think it makes sense, two important things should be assured

Re: Review Request: Mouse hover effect on ListItem

2012-08-09 Thread Marco Martin
> On Aug. 9, 2012, 2:31 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > > I like the idea, but I think it would be less surprising if the opacity > > would actually increase on hover. > > Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > Yes, I know. If everybody agrees I can change that. while makes more semantically sense, i

Re: Review Request: Mouse hover effect on ListItem

2012-08-09 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> On Aug. 9, 2012, 2:37 p.m., Daker Pinheiro wrote: > > I like this kind of behavior, but I think that more people should aprove it. > > Exporting the containsMouse property as well as the background is another > > solution that doesn't breaks > > existing code. Well, here we're not adding any

Re: Review Request: Mouse hover effect on ListItem

2012-08-09 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> On Aug. 9, 2012, 2:31 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > > I like the idea, but I think it would be less surprising if the opacity > > would actually increase on hover. Yes, I know. If everybody agrees I can change that. - Aleix --- This

Re: Review Request: Mouse hover effect on ListItem

2012-08-09 Thread Daker Pinheiro
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105939/#review17154 --- I like this kind of behavior, but I think that more people shou

Re: Current state of System Monitor

2012-08-09 Thread Dmitry
09.08.2012 18:08, Marco Martin пишет: On Thursday 09 August 2012, Dmitry wrote: 09.08.2012 15:10, Marco Martin пишет: On Thursday 09 August 2012, Dmitry wrote: by the way that's what the formfactor mechanism for plasmoids is for. the same plasmoid should adapt itself for an optimal visualizati

Re: Review Request: Mouse hover effect on ListItem

2012-08-09 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105939/#review17153 --- I like the idea, but I think it would be less surprising if the

Re: Current state of System Monitor

2012-08-09 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 09 August 2012, Dmitry wrote: > 09.08.2012 15:10, Marco Martin пишет: > > On Thursday 09 August 2012, Dmitry wrote: > >>> by the way that's what the formfactor mechanism for plasmoids is for. > >>> the same plasmoid should adapt itself for an optimal visualization > >>> wether is in the

Re: Current state of System Monitor

2012-08-09 Thread Dmitry
09.08.2012 15:10, Marco Martin пишет: On Thursday 09 August 2012, Dmitry wrote: by the way that's what the formfactor mechanism for plasmoids is for. the same plasmoid should adapt itself for an optimal visualization wether is in the desktop, an horizontal panel or a vertical one, just check th

Re: Current state of System Monitor

2012-08-09 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 09 August 2012, Dmitry wrote: > > by the way that's what the formfactor mechanism for plasmoids is for. > > the same plasmoid should adapt itself for an optimal visualization wether > > is in the desktop, an horizontal panel or a vertical one, just check the > > plasmoid.formFactor pro

Re: Current state of System Monitor

2012-08-09 Thread Dmitry
09.08.2012 14:27, Marco Martin пишет: On Thursday 09 August 2012, Dmitry wrote: http://doc-snapshot.qt-project.org/5.0/qml-qtquick2-context2d.html Hello, Mark! I think, you haven't understood me right. I don't want to port current C++ system monitor applet because it hasn't been intended to be

Re: Current state of System Monitor

2012-08-09 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 09 August 2012, Dmitry wrote: > > http://doc-snapshot.qt-project.org/5.0/qml-qtquick2-context2d.html > > Hello, Mark! > > I think, you haven't understood me right. I don't want to port current > C++ system monitor applet because it hasn't been intended to be placed > on a panel. I don

Re: Current state of System Monitor

2012-08-09 Thread Dmitry
08.08.2012 17:13, Mark пишет: On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Dmitry wrote: 07.08.2012 13:16, Marco Martin пишет: On Tuesday 07 August 2012, Dmitry wrote: Hello! I'm working on my new system monitor applet. I hate current default C++ applet. So, I've decided to implement my simple system m

Re: Current state of System Monitor

2012-08-09 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 09 August 2012, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote: > On 8 August 2012 16:13, Mark wrote: > > My advice would be to use the current KDE Plasma ported components [1] > > Why to use those and not to use > org.kde.plasma.components it&a=tree&h=

Re: Current state of System Monitor

2012-08-09 Thread Giorgos Tsiapaliokas
On 8 August 2012 16:13, Mark wrote: > My advice would be to use the current KDE Plasma ported components [1] Why to use those and not to use org.kde.plasma.components