Please find below a list of the current regressions reported for Plasma
This search was scheduled by myr...@kde.org.
Plasma regressions
--
Bug 291676:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291676
Priority: NOR Severity: normal Platform: Gentoo Packages
Assignee: plasma-b
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105498/#review15593
---
I've committed a patch which does that, tested with phoenix_fbr
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105498/#review15594
---
This review has been submitted with commit
28f6d7cee7e81fda9ba
2012/7/9 Martin Klapetek :
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>>
>> Someone merged master to KDE/4.9, no clue if anyone is working on fixing
>> it,
>> but just thought you'd want to know KDE/4.9 is broken, you probably don't
>> want
>> to commit there untils it's fixed.
>
On Monday, July 09, 2012 22:55:46 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Someone merged master to KDE/4.9, no clue if anyone is working on fixing
> it, but just thought you'd want to know KDE/4.9 is broken, you probably
> don't want to commit there untils it's fixed.
Fix is being worked on.
--
sebas
http:/
On Monday 09 July 2012 22:29:59 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Monday 09 July 2012, Viranch Mehta wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > While I was trying to push my commit to KDE/4.9 after pushing to master,
> > I landed pushing all of master to KDE/4.9 branch. I was asked to give a
> > request for reverting this to
On Monday 09 July 2012, Viranch Mehta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While I was trying to push my commit to KDE/4.9 after pushing to master,
> I landed pushing all of master to KDE/4.9 branch. I was asked to give a
> request for reverting this to the project's git maintainers.
>
> So can someone please look i
Hi,
While I was trying to push my commit to KDE/4.9 after pushing to master,
I landed pushing all of master to KDE/4.9 branch. I was asked to give a
request for reverting this to the project's git maintainers.
So can someone please look into this? My apologies for the inconvenience.
Cheers,
Vira
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105483/
---
(Updated July 9, 2012, 12:27 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Runtime, Plasma,
On Monday 09 July 2012, Mark wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I really have to stress this out. It annoys me to even see it since it
> seems so obvious (to me).
> When you port some GUI part of KDE from C++ to QML i would expect the
> porter to keep:
> - feature parity
> - visual parity
> - functional parit
10 matches
Mail list logo