Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
2011/10/2 Michael Pyne : > On Sunday, October 02, 2011 19:52:09 Dario Freddi wrote: >> On Sunday 02 October 2011 19:35:15 Michael Pyne wrote: >> > And even assuming the user knows how to do this, if they want to change >> > power  management options we are saying that they need to duplicate an >> >

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
For people interested, this is how the new config UI+Battery plasmoid are roughly going to look like, to finally throw away the concerns about the configurability and the ¨presentation¨-like things. http://vimeo.com/29919817 Vimeo is broken apparently, but you can still download the video. Hope t

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
Btw, I would like to leave the readers, mainly the two who are accusing me of being a d**k, an exercise and count how many times the following questions came up: -Ok but I cannot watch my videos anymore -I will not be able to configure my profiles anymore -Blahblah I want to do power management

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
2011/10/2 David Jarvie : > On Sunday 02 October 2011 18:47:19 Dario Freddi wrote: >> On Sunday 02 October 2011 19:34:42 Andreas Pakulat wrote: >> > That leaves out the use-case of not wanting to inhibit all aspects of >> > the current power-save mode, but only a part by switching to a different >>

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
2011/10/2 todd rme : > On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Dario Freddi wrote: >> On Sunday 02 October 2011 21:03:45 todd rme wrote: >>> Thinking over the conversation a bit, I think the disagreement stems >>> not from the activities vs. profiles issue, but rather different >>> expectations about what

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
2011/10/2 Scott Kitterman : > On Sunday, October 02, 2011 09:28:42 PM Dario Freddi wrote: >> No, sorry to say that again. There are two categories of people: those who >> know what they are talking about and those who don't. Your understanding of >> this categorization is coming from the fact that

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
2011/10/2 Scott Kitterman : > On Sunday, October 02, 2011 08:37:58 PM Dario Freddi wrote: >> On Sunday 02 October 2011 20:31:37 Martin Gräßlin wrote: >> > And that's now exactly the point: if you don't have any clue about what >> > is happening your "I want to save power and  not let the computer >

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread todd rme
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Dario Freddi wrote: > On Sunday 02 October 2011 21:03:45 todd rme wrote: >> Thinking over the conversation a bit, I think the disagreement stems >> not from the activities vs. profiles issue, but rather different >> expectations about what power management is and wh

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Andras Mantia
On Sunday, October 02, 2011 20:31:11 Dario Freddi wrote: > I don't think so. Every other system does a similar thing: there is no > use in saving battery when you're on AC, when you are on battery > these components are turned off. I don't think this should be > configurable at all, and to a certai

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
On Sunday 02 October 2011 21:03:45 todd rme wrote: > Thinking over the conversation a bit, I think the disagreement stems > not from the activities vs. profiles issue, but rather different > expectations about what power management is and what it should do. > People seem to be talking past each ot

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread todd rme
Important In-Game InformationImportant In-Game InformationImportant In-Game InformationOn Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Saturday 01 October 2011 16:27:48 Dario Freddi wrote: >> Hello all, and sorry for cross-posting. >> >> Hopefully, this solution will please everyone and

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
On Sunday 02 October 2011 20:31:37 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > And that's now exactly the point: if you don't have any clue about what is > happening your "I want to save power and not let the computer decide" > might be much worse than what the computer would do. No matter how many times I will quot

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
On Sunday 02 October 2011 19:57:33 Andras Mantia wrote: > On Sunday, October 02, 2011 17:04:50 Martin Gr��lin wrote: > > So please calmn down and lets focus on improving the user experience > > by not spending too much time on too long� threads. > > I'm far from being upset or anything. I just gav

Re: Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Sunday 02 October 2011 21:09:00 Andras Mantia wrote: > On Sunday, October 02, 2011 14:45:58 Dario Freddi wrote: > > > That was one example. Another example brought up is e.g switching of > > > strigi or nepomuk indexing when switching to a power saving profile. > > > These two are something that

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
On Sunday 02 October 2011 20:09:00 Andras Mantia wrote: > On Sunday, October 02, 2011 14:45:58 Dario Freddi wrote: > > > That was one example. Another example brought up is e.g switching of > > > strigi or nepomuk indexing when switching to a power saving profile. > > > These two are something that

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Andras Mantia
On Sunday, October 02, 2011 17:04:50 Martin Gr��lin wrote: > So please calmn down and lets focus on improving the user experience > by not spending too much time on too long� threads. I'm far from being upset or anything. I just gave my opinion, which seems to match others as well. We were *asked

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Andras Mantia
On Sunday, October 02, 2011 14:45:58 Dario Freddi wrote: > > That was one example. Another example brought up is e.g switching of > > strigi or nepomuk indexing when switching to a power saving profile. > > These two are something that usually kick in when you are in idle > > mode, exactly when the

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
On Sunday 02 October 2011 20:03:47 Stefan Majewsky wrote: > On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Dario Freddi wrote: > > I still haven't found a "you're > > right" after a thousand times I've been explaining the only real saver > > you can configure is brightness, and this kinda concerns me. > > You a

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
On Sunday 02 October 2011 19:51:11 Stefan Majewsky wrote: > On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Dario Freddi wrote: > > I will conclude the argument by saying that the > > skepticals can now check out, in kde-workspace, my branch dafre/new- > > powerdevil, which is implementing everything I said (new

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
On Sunday 02 October 2011 19:48:03 Michael Pyne wrote: > Yes, actually. But if the movie player doesn't do this, why should we > forbid the user from being able to easily do it? Oh my god. People, you need to get your acts together and learn to read before crazy-post. I stated a number of times

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
On Sunday 02 October 2011 19:34:42 Andreas Pakulat wrote: > That leaves out the use-case of not wanting to inhibit all aspects of > the current power-save mode, but only a part by switching to a different > mode that is similar but differs in one or two aspects. I can think for > example for powers

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
On Sunday 02 October 2011 17:04:50 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Saturday 01 October 2011 16:27:48 Dario Freddi wrote: > > Hello all, and sorry for cross-posting. > > > > Hopefully, this solution will please everyone and will make activities > > even more useful. Do you like it? More suggestions? Spe

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread todd rme
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Saturday 01 October 2011 16:27:48 Dario Freddi wrote: >> Hello all, and sorry for cross-posting. >> >> Hopefully, this solution will please everyone and will make activities even >> more useful. Do you like it? More suggestions? Speak now

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Saturday 01 October 2011 16:27:48 Dario Freddi wrote: > Hello all, and sorry for cross-posting. > > Hopefully, this solution will please everyone and will make activities even > more useful. Do you like it? More suggestions? Speak now or shut up forever! Hi all, I urge everyone to calm down ab

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
On Sunday 02 October 2011 16:33:05 Dario Freddi wrote: > support for changing the CPU > governor has been removed ... from all userspace tools. Sorry this bit didn't get in for any reason. -- --- Dario Freddi KDE Developer GPG Key Signature: 511A9A3B signature.asc Description

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
On Sunday 02 October 2011 16:26:16 Markus Slopianka wrote: > On Samstag 01 Oktober 2011 16:27:48 Dario Freddi wrote: > > We focused on simplicity, > > still without losing power-user features > > Quite frankly: What you describe sounds way more complicated. Don't see any > simplicity in your propo

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Alberto Villa
after reading the full thread i think i'm ok with everything, but... On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Dario Freddi wrote: > The first, important part: we plan to remove the "Warning" step can you please just leave a notification for this? even if it doesn't trigger a profile change, it's very use

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Thomas Zander
> > > So I think there are more settings then display brightness (that > > > you usually can control anyway with an Fn shortcut on laptops). > > > > Again, as I said before, I am pretty sure there are no settings except > > brightness which require you to change to a different profile - in > > fac

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Torgny Nyblom
On Saturday 01 October 2011 21.02.19 Dario Freddi wrote: [...] > > Also please do not remove the possibility to change how a certain state > > should look like. So far I've always changed the "on battery" profile. > > I think there is a certain misunderstanding here. I have said the > possibility

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Torgny Nyblom
On Saturday 01 October 2011 20.33.06 Andras Mantia wrote: > On Saturday, October 01, 2011 16:27:48 Dario Freddi wrote: > > Hello all, and sorry for cross-posting. > > > > [...] > > I can't comment on activities, never used them, nor feel the need to use > them. So this sounds more like the power

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Thomas Zander
On Saturday 01 October 2011 16.27.48 Dario Freddi wrote: > Suppose you want to have an activity named "Sleep", in which you watch a > movie, and the PC will shutdown after 90 mins of inactivity. In this case, > you would just specify to override the "Suspend Session" action. Or, you > want to hav

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
On Sunday 02 October 2011 15:04:35 Alberto Villa wrote: > can you please just leave a notification for this? even if it doesn't > trigger a profile change, it's very useful to know that the battery is > going to die soon Makes sense indeed -- --- Dario Freddi KDE Developer GPG K

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Sunday, October 02, 2011 14:27:03 Dario Freddi wrote: > On Sunday 02 October 2011 02:35:34 Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Dario Freddi wrote: > > > we plan to remove the "Warning" step > > > > > > > > Uhm, wait a minute… Do you mean you will just suspend or shut down the > > machine with no warning wh

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
On Sunday 02 October 2011 11:22:45 todd rme wrote: > On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Thomas Zander wrote: > >> I mean, the profile can be changed by switching Activities, so what is > >> the technical reason it cannot be done by the user directly? The reason > >> I'm concerned is that it takes co

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
On Sunday 02 October 2011 09:51:35 todd rme wrote: > On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Dario Freddi wrote: > > On Saturday 01 October 2011 21:30:02 Lukas wrote: > >> Both are quite unusual but possible situations, but creating new > >> activity and moving all files/settings does not pay off. > > >

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
On Sunday 02 October 2011 12:04:15 Andras Mantia wrote: > On Saturday, October 01, 2011 23:13:06 Dario Freddi wrote: > > > Is it? Certainly disabling desktop effects and 3D acceleration has > > > an > > > impact. > > > > Sorry to disappoint you, but this action will be removed in 4.8. > > Martin h

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Dario Freddi
On Sunday 02 October 2011 02:35:34 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Dario Freddi wrote: > > we plan to remove the "Warning" step > > Uhm, wait a minute… Do you mean you will just suspend or shut down the > machine with no warning whatsoever? You are confusing it with the "Critical" step, which is obviously

Re: Re: ScreenSaver and KDE Plasma 4.8?

2011-10-02 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Sunday 02 October 2011 14:15:01 Luca Beltrame wrote: > In data domenica 02 ottobre 2011 10:43:43, Ivan Čukić ha scritto: > > > It needs to specify that "no X Screensavers" doesn't mean "no screensavers" > > krop on IRC raised an interesting question: is this "drop of support" related > to just s

Re: ScreenSaver and KDE Plasma 4.8?

2011-10-02 Thread Luca Beltrame
In data domenica 02 ottobre 2011 10:43:43, Ivan Čukić ha scritto: > It needs to specify that "no X Screensavers" doesn't mean "no screensavers" krop on IRC raised an interesting question: is this "drop of support" related to just support, or also library dependencies? This because some stuff such

Re: Re: ScreenSaver and KDE Plasma 4.8?

2011-10-02 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Sunday 02 October 2011 13:27:13 Luca Beltrame wrote: > In data domenica 02 ottobre 2011 12:19:02, Martin Gräßlin ha scritto: > > > Poll created: http://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?ff&t�102 > > I just blogged about this, so the poll gets more exposure. cool thanks - I plan to also blog about it t

Re: ScreenSaver and KDE Plasma 4.8?

2011-10-02 Thread Luca Beltrame
In data domenica 02 ottobre 2011 12:19:02, Martin Gräßlin ha scritto: > Poll created: http://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?ff&t—102 I just blogged about this, so the poll gets more exposure. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79 signature.asc Description:

Re: Re: Re: ScreenSaver and KDE Plasma 4.8?

2011-10-02 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Sunday 02 October 2011 22:07:30 Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > On Sunday 02 October 2011 09:26:34 Luca Beltrame wrote: > >> In data domenica 02 ottobre 2011 02:47:49, Kevin Kofler ha scritto: > >> > >> > without a custom Plasma init script enabli

Re: The future of Power Management - together with Activities

2011-10-02 Thread Andras Mantia
On Saturday, October 01, 2011 23:13:06 Dario Freddi wrote: > > Is it? Certainly disabling desktop effects and 3D acceleration has > > an > > impact. > > Sorry to disappoint you, but this action will be removed in 4.8. > Martin has explicitely stated that for how compositing in KDE works > now turn

Re: ScreenSaver and KDE Plasma 4.8?

2011-10-02 Thread Luca Beltrame
In data domenica 02 ottobre 2011 10:31:32, Martin Gräßlin ha scritto: > would no longer support X Screensavers? * I would switch to another DE Is there a good definition of "X" and "non X" screensavers? This is IMO important to communicate to the userbase as for them they are likely one and the s

Re: Re: ScreenSaver and KDE Plasma 4.8?

2011-10-02 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Sunday 02 October 2011 09:26:34 Luca Beltrame wrote: >> In data domenica 02 ottobre 2011 02:47:49, Kevin Kofler ha scritto: >> >> > without a custom Plasma init script enabling the folder view of ~/Desktop >> > one way or the other (either

Re: Re: ScreenSaver and KDE Plasma 4.8?

2011-10-02 Thread Ivan Čukić
> What would you say if KDE Plasma would no longer support X Screensavers? It needs to specify that "no X Screensavers" doesn't mean "no screensavers" -- Cheerio, Ivan -- While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words Dying to believe in what you heard I was staring straight into the

Re: Re: ScreenSaver and KDE Plasma 4.8?

2011-10-02 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Sunday 02 October 2011 09:26:34 Luca Beltrame wrote: > In data domenica 02 ottobre 2011 02:47:49, Kevin Kofler ha scritto: > > > without a custom Plasma init script enabling the folder view of ~/Desktop > > one way or the other (either as a widget as in 4.6 or in Fedora 16, or the > > KDE-3-sty

Re: ScreenSaver and KDE Plasma 4.8?

2011-10-02 Thread Ivan Čukić
@Martin I say kill X screensaver, and we'll make a few cute QML ones to ship instead. @all For me, it is not only about X-code versus non-X-code. It is also about security of scrsaver's execution. > Probably because the distros are not shipping 4.7 yet. (4.1 to 4.6 actually > do show desktop ic

Re: ScreenSaver and KDE Plasma 4.8?

2011-10-02 Thread Luca Beltrame
In data domenica 02 ottobre 2011 02:47:49, Kevin Kofler ha scritto: > without a custom Plasma init script enabling the folder view of ~/Desktop > one way or the other (either as a widget as in 4.6 or in Fedora 16, or the > KDE-3-style "folder view as desktop" mode), complaints will start popping i

Re: ScreenSaver and KDE Plasma 4.8?

2011-10-02 Thread Martin Gräßlin
- Ursprüngliche Mitteilung - > Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > unless we give them something better and communicate with > > understanding. > > Users will not accept your "something better" unless their favorite > existing  screensaver runs on it. No amount of communication can change > that.