Re: QML support for kdevelop and plasmate

2011-09-20 Thread Giorgos Tsiapaliwkas
On 20 September 2011 19:06, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > I think the 3 days refer to his outstanding review requests, not the > language > plugin. > correct.:) On 20 September 2011 12:29, Milian Wolff wrote: > > Sure. But "has" is too strong a word ;-) "should" is much better here I > think > :P

Re: QML support for kdevelop and plasmate

2011-09-20 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 11:29:48 Milian Wolff wrote: > > As it regards plasmate,i will fix my currect reviews(in the worst case it > > is a 3 days work) and then i will work on that. > > [...] > Since you seem to be in a hurry, if you think three days make a difference > or not, [...] I th

Re: QML support for kdevelop and plasmate

2011-09-20 Thread Milian Wolff
Giorgos Tsiapaliwkas, 19.09.2011: > Hello, > > right now we don't have QML support neither for plasmate of for > kdevelop.This has to change if we want to help ourselves and > future developers.I recall that the first time that i code in Qt that > kdevelop helped me a lot,so the same has to be don

Re: org.kde.devicecapabilities

2011-09-20 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Friday, September 16, 2011 16:38:03 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > commens, suggestions, vetos to the revamp, etc all welcome. No suggestion to the last question, but in general, the changes look good (and the "move stuff into pm engine" was on my list anyway). Thanks, -- sebas http://www.kde.org