> On May 9, 2011, 9:27 p.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > this must not be included in the default bindings set. it must become an
> > extension, just as HTTP and NetworkIO are. i'm not entirely convinced that
> > raw Socket access is needed, though the other half of me can imagine
> > scenarios
Hi all,
as we all know the hard feature freeze is in place since somewhen last week. So
we are
supposed to fix bugs and no longer work on features. But we all want to
continue hacking.
At Tokamak we wanted to setup an integration repository and I think now is the
timepoint to
get this starte
> On May 14, 2011, 4:01 a.m., Shaun Reich wrote:
> > Are you sure the behaviour for the Qt method 100% equivalent to the
> > current? I ask this because now that the deprecated method forwards to it,
> > naturally it's quite important to make sure nothing gets fscked up.
>
> Nicolas Alvarez wr
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101367/
---
(Updated May 15, 2011, 7:29 a.m.)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101367/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Summary
---
As QPixmap::handle is not retu
