Re: GSoC QMLify plasmoids proposal

2011-03-29 Thread Viranch Mehta
Hi Marco, On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Marco Martin wrote: > please also state that you will work together whoever will write the plasma > qtcomponents set (hope there will be a separate gsoc for that, could end up > be > necessary you to work also on them...) > > Could you please give me so

Re: Resource scoring and activity relation

2011-03-29 Thread Ivan Cukic
> Then I misread, please disregard my earlier point. NP, we should probably need to communicate this a bit more clearly. It seems like activities in general are rather fuzzy to some people. Cheerio, Ivan -- You know, there are many people in the country today who, through no fault of their ow

Re: Resource scoring and activity relation

2011-03-29 Thread todd rme
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Ivan Cukic wrote: > >> I might have I misread it. I thought this was about scoring >> applications.  Reading it a second time I am not sure anymore.  Is >> this about scoring applications or resources within applications or >> both? > > Mainly about resources in ap

Re: Resource scoring and activity relation

2011-03-29 Thread Ivan Cukic
> I might have I misread it. I thought this was about scoring > applications. Reading it a second time I am not sure anymore. Is > this about scoring applications or resources within applications or > both? Mainly about resources in apps - for example, places ppl visit in dolphin, web pages in

Re: Resource scoring and activity relation

2011-03-29 Thread todd rme
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Ivan Cukic wrote: > >> Should this be explicitly restricted to applications?  I could also >> see it have relevance for other things, such as which websites to > > Maybe I misunderstood you, but rekonq is an application, right? > > Every app that wants to support t

Re: Resource scoring and activity relation

2011-03-29 Thread Ivan Cukic
> Should this be explicitly restricted to applications? I could also > see it have relevance for other things, such as which websites to Maybe I misunderstood you, but rekonq is an application, right? Every app that wants to support this api will be able to use it to track documents/resources

Re: Resource scoring and activity relation

2011-03-29 Thread todd rme
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Sebastian Trüg wrote: > Hi list, > > for some time now the idea of scoring resources based on usage > statistics and other criteria is floating around. > > 1. RESOURCE SCORE > > In the beginning the idea was simple: calculate one score for each > resource and reme

Resource scoring and activity relation

2011-03-29 Thread Sebastian Trüg
Hi list, for some time now the idea of scoring resources based on usage statistics and other criteria is floating around. 1. RESOURCE SCORE In the beginning the idea was simple: calculate one score for each resource and remember it as nao:score. This score could have been maintained by some scor

Re: GSoC QMLify plasmoids proposal

2011-03-29 Thread Sebastian Kügler
Hi Viranch, On Tuesday, March 29, 2011 16:39:10 Viranch Mehta wrote:> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > I thin the focus should be on: > > > > - Port Plasmoids visual appearance and interaction to QML and JavaScript > > > > This tempts me to mention about QGraphicsVi

Re: GSoC QMLify plasmoids proposal

2011-03-29 Thread Viranch Mehta
Hi Sebas, On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > I thin the focus should be on: > > - Port Plasmoids visual appearance and interaction to QML and JavaScript > > This tempts me to mention about QGraphicsView (so that it is specifically clear that from what the plasmoids are go

Re: GSoC QMLify plasmoids proposal

2011-03-29 Thread Sebastian Kügler
Hi Viranch, On Monday, March 28, 2011 13:07:39 Viranch Mehta wrote: > Please review my proposal for GSoC project QMLify Plasmoids: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/19zZn2ObkGWFRVOjaaVu1qp54Olb7g50FN6RgyAQ > hFm0/edit?hl=en&authkey=CKPlh6oP > > I've specified the order of plasmoids that I thin