Re: Google Summer of Code

2011-03-28 Thread José Expósito
Thank you very much to all for your help and your interest. I think that in few days I will send two proposals to the KDE project, one to collaborate in KWin (Workspace and Wayland) and other to add multitouch support, thus, all mentors could see this issue and decide if are interested or not. Th

Re: GSoC QMLify plasmoids proposal

2011-03-28 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 28 March 2011, Viranch Mehta wrote: > > please also state that you will work together whoever will write the > > plasma qtcomponents set (hope there will be a separate gsoc for that, > > could end up be > > necessary you to work also on them...) > > > > If qtcomponents gsoc doesn't get i

Re: GSoC QMLify plasmoids proposal

2011-03-28 Thread Viranch Mehta
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Marco Martin wrote: > > Hi, > the proposal is good, it should be a bit more elaborate tough. > the "qmlfy" term was used just for fun, however the official proposal > should > have a bit more serious name, like "QML port of workspace and addons > plasmoids" > > My

Re: Plasma-devel post from mous16_2...@yahoo.it requires approval

2011-03-28 Thread Marco Martin
On Friday 25 March 2011, plasma-devel-ow...@kde.org wrote: > Hi list, > I'm Francesco, an Italian student, and I want join GSoC. > I've readed the QML-ify plasmoids ideas, and I wrote this proposal: > https://docs.google.com/viewer?pid=explorer&srcid=0B9Iwh4lLeOxMNWNlYTEyMGIt > NWZmOC00YzdjLWI5ZDIt

Re: GSoC QMLify plasmoids proposal

2011-03-28 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 28 March 2011, Viranch Mehta wrote: > Hi, > > Please review my proposal for GSoC project QMLify Plasmoids: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/19zZn2ObkGWFRVOjaaVu1qp54Olb7g50FN6RgyAQ > hFm0/edit?hl=en&authkey=CKPlh6oP > > I've specified the order of plasmoids that I think would be app

GSoC QMLify plasmoids proposal

2011-03-28 Thread Viranch Mehta
Hi, Please review my proposal for GSoC project QMLify Plasmoids: https://docs.google.com/document/d/19zZn2ObkGWFRVOjaaVu1qp54Olb7g50FN6RgyAQhFm0/edit?hl=en&authkey=CKPlh6oP I've specified the order of plasmoids that I think would be appropriate in increasing order of complexity. Thanks, Viranch

Re: Mobile and GSOC

2011-03-28 Thread Marco Martin
On Sunday 27 March 2011, Davide Bettio wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/27/11 21:24, Marco Martin wrote: > > to me, as i explained before what is important is not much the > > applications per se, but how are written and how they use said mobile > > stack, i'm still not sure how many of those pieces should