On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Hayri Bakici wrote:
> I think it's pretty good. You pointed out the reasons of your doings,
> which imo are really important. Last year, I wrote two use cases in my
> proposal, however I don't know if something like that really fits in
> yours.
>
>
Well, the plasm
> On March 14, 2011, 7:06 p.m., Diego Casella wrote:
> > Ok, sorry again for my late reply :(
> > Services are working great, however, I think you should refactor the way
> > the 'mixer' DataEngine works, because it doesn't completely performs what
> > it is supposed to.
> > Let me explain bett
I think it's pretty good. You pointed out the reasons of your doings,
which imo are really important. Last year, I wrote two use cases in my
proposal, however I don't know if something like that really fits in
yours.
cheers
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Viranch Mehta wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6587/#review9984
---
Ok, sorry again for my late reply :(
Services are working great, h
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> [If you're in the CC: of this email explicitely, please reply to it in any
> case.]
>
> The short version:
>
>Are you OK with changing the license in the unlicensed files you
> have
>worked on in Plasmate to GP
On Tuesday, March 15, 2011, Farhad Hedayati-Fard wrote:
> Hi!
> I've written a translation dataengine... It needs 3 arguments to initialize
> the translator object ( plugin name, source language and destination
> language). I've put a Q_ASSERT on args.size() in dataengine's constructor
> but now I
Hi!
I've written a translation dataengine... It needs 3 arguments to initialize
the translator object ( plugin name, source language and destination
language). I've put a Q_ASSERT on args.size() in dataengine's constructor but
now I can't test my dataengine using plasmaengineexplorer because it
"I am OK with the licensing changes you propose." :)
Jason "moofang" Lim Yuen Hoe
http://yuenhoe.co.cc/
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> [If you're in the CC: of this email explicitely, please reply to it in any
> case.]
>
> The short version:
>
>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> [If you're in the CC: of this email explicitely, please reply to it in any
> case.]
>
> The short version:
>
> Are you OK with changing the license in the unlicensed files you have
> worked on in Plasmate to GPLV2
Hi Sebas,
I'm ok ...
Thanks for reporting this,
Cheers,
Sandro
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> [If you're in the CC: of this email explicitely, please reply to it in any
> case.]
>
> The short version:
>
> Are you OK with changing the license in th
Hi all,
[If you're in the CC: of this email explicitely, please reply to it in any
case.]
The short version:
Are you OK with changing the license in the unlicensed files you have
worked on in Plasmate to GPLV2+ and KDE e.V. approved licenses?
Longer version:
Over the weekend
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Friday, March 11, 2011 19:28:13 todd rme wrote:
> > Might it be good to start with the ones that are already in-progress,
> > that way you can directly compare the the existing plasmoid code and
> > the QML code and thus, hopefully, ge
On Friday, March 11, 2011 19:28:13 todd rme wrote:
> Might it be good to start with the ones that are already in-progress,
> that way you can directly compare the the existing plasmoid code and
> the QML code and thus, hopefully, get a feel for how to do the
> porting?
But the ones which are in pr
13 matches
Mail list logo
